Low-complexity Power Spectral Density Estimation

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 325)

Abstract

This paper presents a method of feature extraction to detect seizure in epileptic patients . Epileptic seizures are characterized by high amplitude and synchronized electrocephalogram (EEG) waveforms. Power spectral density (PSD) of the EEG signal plays an important role in diagnosis of epilepsy. Many automated diagnostic systems for epileptic seizure detection have emerged in recent years. This paper proposes a method of extracting PSD of EEG sub-bands using low-complex PSD estimation method which would reduce the automatic diagnostic system complexity and also enhances the speed. Low-complexity PSD estimation method was implemented in digital signal processor (TMS320C6713), and the result was very much similar to traditional Welch PSD estimation method with 30 % reduction in computation time.

Keywords

Electrocephalogram Power spectral density Digital signal processor SONAR RADAR 

References

  1. 1.
    P.D. Welch, The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 70–73 (1967)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.K. Parhi, M. Ayinala, Low-complexity welch power spectral density computation. IEEE Trans. Circuit Syst. (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Barbé, R. Pintelon, J. Schoukens, Welch method revisited: Nonparametric power spectrum estimation via circular overlap. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 58(2), 553–556 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.-F. Liang, H.-C. Wang, W.-L. Chang, Combination of EEG complexity and spectral analysis for epilepsy diagnosis and seizure detection. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.R. Mousavi, M. Niknazar, B.V. Vahdat, in Epileptic Seizure Detection Using AR Model on EEG Signals. Proceedings of Cario International Biomedical Engineering Conference (CIBEC ’08), 1–4 Dec 2008Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B.C. Kuo, D.A. Landgrbe, Nonparametric weighted feature extraction for classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 42, 1096–1105 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.I. Laakso, V. Valimaki, M. Karjalainen, U.K. Laine, Splitting the unit delay [FIR/all pass filters design]. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 13(1), 30–60 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Hermanowicz, Explicit formulas for weighing coefficients of maximally flat tunable FIR delayers. Electron. Letters. 28(20), 1936–1937 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Garg, S. Behl, V. Singh, Assessment of non-parametric and parametric PSD estimation methods for automated epileptic seizure detection. J. Comput. 3(5), 160–163 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    R.G. Andrzejak, K. Lehnertz, C. Rieke, Indications of non linear deterministic and finite dimensional structures in time series of brain electrical activity dependence on recording region and brain state. Phys.Rev.E. 64 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ECE DepartmentSSN College of EngineeringChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations