Advertisement

Contourlet-Based Multiband Image Fusion for Improving Classification Accuracy in IRS LISS III Images

  • K. Venkateswaran
  • N. Kasthuri
  • K. Balakrishnan
  • K. Prakash
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 325)

Abstract

Unsupervised classification plays a vital role in overseeing the transformations on the earth surface. Unsupervised classification has an indispensable role in an immense range of applications such as remote sensing, motion detection, environmental monitoring, medical diagnosis, damage assessment, agricultural surveys, and surveillance. In this paper, a novel method for unsupervised classification in multitemporal optical images based on image fusion and Gaussian RBF kernel K-means clustering is proposed. Here, the image is generated by performing contourlet-based multiband image fusion on the red, green, and near-IR images. On the finest image generated by collecting the information from three bands, Gaussian RBF kernel K-means clustering is performed. In Gaussian RBF kernel K-means, nonlinear clustering is performed, as a result the false alarm rate is reduced and accuracy of the clustering process is enhanced. The aggregation of image fusion and RBF kernel K-means clustering is seen to be more effective in detecting the changes than its preexistences.

Keywords

Contourlet K-means LISS III image and fusion 

References

  1. 1.
    G.M. Food, Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 80, 185–201 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.B.R. Jipkate, M.V.V. Gohokar, A comparative analysis of fuzzy C-means clustering and K-means clustering algorithms. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. 2(3), 737–739 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Bruzzone, D.F. Prieto, An adaptive semiparametric and context-based approach to unsupervised change detection in multitemporal remote-sensing images. IEEE Trans. Image Proces. 11(4), 66–77 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Dumontier, F. Luthon, J.-P. Charras, Real-time DSP implementation for MRF-based video motion detection. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 8(10), 1341–1347 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Collins, A. Lipton, T. Kanade, Introduction to special section on video surveillance. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(8), 745–746 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Grover, S. Quegan, C. da Costa Freitas, Quantitative estimation of tropical forest cover by SAR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37(1), 479–490 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.S. Chavez Jr, D.J. MacKinnon, Automatic detection of vegetation changes in the south western united states using remotely sensed images. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 60(5), 1285–1294 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.R. Merril, L. Jiajun, A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sens. Environ. 63(2), 95–100 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Abu-Zeid, R, Kashif, O.M. Badawy, Immune based clustering for medical diagnosyic systems, in IEEE Xplore, Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Sezgin, B. Sankur, A survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J. Electron. Image 13(1), 146–165 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Gong, J. Zhou, Z. Ma, Change detection in SAR images based on image fusion and improved fuzzy clustering. IEEETrans. Image Process. 21(4), 2141–2151 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.A. Alaguraja, V. Anand, S. Maidani, Wavelet frame based feature extraction technique for improving classification accuracy. J Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 37, 423–471 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.N. Do, M. Vetterli, The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14(12), 2091–2106 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Zheng, C. Zhu, J. Song, X. Zhao, Fusion of multiband SAR images based on contourlet transform, in IEEE International Conference on Information Acquisition (2006), pp. 420–424Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Venkateswaran, N. Kasthuri, C. Arathy, V. Haran, D.D. Jeni, A survey on unsupervised change detection algorithms, in IEEE International Conference on ICCPCT (2013), pp. 897–903Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.A. Alaguraja, V. Anand, S. Maidani, Wavelet based post classification change detection technique for urban growth monitoring. J Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 41(1), 35–43 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S.S. Al-amri, N.V. Kalyankar, S.D. Khamitkar, A comparative study of removal noise from remote sensing image. IJSCI. 7(1), (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.S. Shifa, M.S. Naweed, M. Omar, M.Z. Jhandir, T. Ahmed, Classification of cotton and sugarcane plants on the basis of their spectral behavior (2011), pp. 2119–2125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Venkateswaran
    • 1
  • N. Kasthuri
    • 1
  • K. Balakrishnan
    • 1
  • K. Prakash
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ECEKongu Engineering CollegeErodeIndia

Personalised recommendations