Reliable Virtual Cluster-Based Opportunistic Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad hoc Networks

  • E. Sahaya Rose Vigita
  • E. Golden Julie
  • S. Tamil Selvi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 325)


Geographic opportunistic routing protocols overcome the failure of traditional routing protocols which fail due to the dynamic nature of mobile ad hoc networks. When link stability is considered for forwarder selection, the hop count and delay become unpredictable. Hence, a new protocol, delay-aware cluster-based opportunistic Routing (DACOR) protocol, has been proposed. In DACOR, nodes with high transmission range form loose clusters with surrounding nodes. When such high-power nodes are not available, nodes with lower transmission range enable the routing process by opportunistically selecting the best forwarder based on link stability. When no neighbors are found, a routing hole handling mechanism is also proposed. Simulation results show that the presence of high transmission nodes reduces the hop count, thus ensuring low delay, and opportunistic routing guarantees reliable data delivery.


Mobile ad hoc networks Loose virtual clustering Opportunistic routing Reliability Low delay Mobility Link stability 


  1. 1.
    A. Trivino-Cabrera, S. Canadas-Hurtado, Survey on opportunistic routing in multihop wireless networks. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Inf. Secur. (IJCNIS). 3(2), 1–329 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Chen, P.K. Varshney, A survey of void handling techniques for geographic routing in wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. 9(1), 50–67 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.M. Popescu, I.G. Peng, A.H. Kemp, Surveying position based routing protocols for wireless sensor and ad-hoc networks. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Inf. Secur. (IJCNIS) 4(1), 325–349 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Jane, Y. Peter, H.J. Chong, A Survey of clustering schemes for mobile adhoc networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. 7(1), 32–48 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Liu, C. Zhang, G. Yao, F. Yuguang, Delar, A device energy-load aware relaying framework for heterogeneous mobile adhoc networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 29(8), 1572–1584 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Wu, F. Dai, Virtual backbone construction in MANETs using adjustable transmission ranges. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 5(9), 1188–1200 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    X. Du, D. Wu, W. Liu, Y. Fang, Multiclass routing and medium access control for heterogeneous mobile adhoc networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 55(1), 270–277 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y.-C. Lai, P. Lin, W. Liao, C.-M. Chen, A Region-based Clustering mechanism for channel access in Vehicular adhoc networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 29(1), 83–93 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Zhao, X. Yang, W. Yu, X. Fu, A Loose Virtual Clustering based Routing for Heterogeneous MANETs. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 99, 2290–2302 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Yang, C.K. Yeo, B.S. Lee, Towards reliable data delivery for highly dynamic mobile adhoc networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comp. 11(1), 111–124 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stepanov, D. Herrscher, K. Rothermel, On the impact of radio propagation models on MANET simulation results. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Mobile and Wireless Communications Networks. (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Schiller, Mobile Communications (Pearson, New Jersey, 2009), pp. 36–41Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Sahaya Rose Vigita
    • 1
  • E. Golden Julie
    • 1
  • S. Tamil Selvi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAnna UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of ECENational Engineering CollegeTirunelveliIndia

Personalised recommendations