Advertisement

Performance Comparison of BEMRP, MZRP, MCEDAR, ODMRP, DCMP, and FGMP to Achieve Group Communication in MANET

  • M. RajeswariEmail author
  • P. Uma Maheswari
  • S. Bhuvaneshwari
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a comparative performance of six multicast protocols for mobile ad hoc networks—BEMRP, MZRP, MCEDAR, ODMRP, DCMP, and FGMP focusing on the effects of changes such as the increasing number of receivers or sources and increasing the number of nodes. Although some simulation results of MANET protocols have been published before, these six protocols have not been compared in isolation. In recent years, a number of new multicast protocols have been proposed for ad hoc networks. Due to the limited transmission range of wireless mobile nodes, multiple network hops may be required for one node to exchange the data with another across the network. Multicasting is an efficient method for implementing group communications. But, it is difficult to achieve this, due to the difficulty in group membership management over a dynamic topology. A systematic performance evaluation of these protocols is done by performing certain simulations under NS-2.

Keywords

Multicasting BEMRP MZRP MCEDAR ODMRP DCMP FGMP 

References

  1. 1.
    Mo’men, A.M.A., Hamza, H.S., Saroit, I.A.: A Survey on Security Enhanced Multicast Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, ISBN 978-1-14244-9924-3. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiang, C.C., Gerla, M., an Zhang, L.: Forwarding group multicasting protocol for Multi-Hop, mobile wireless networks. Cluster Comput 1(2), 187–196 (1998). Special Issue on Mobile ComputingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Das, S.K., Manoj, B.S., Siva Ram Murthy, C.: A dynamic core-based multicast routing protocol for Ad Hoc mobile networks. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing (MobiHoc ‘02), pp. 24–35, 2002Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chao G., Mohapatra P,: Scalable Multicasting in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. ISBN 0-7803-8355-9, IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiang, X., Wang, X., Yang, Y.: Supporting efficient and scalable multicasting over mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 10(5), 544–559 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Royer, E.M., Perkins, C.E.: Multicast operation of the ad hoc on demand distance vector routing protocol. In CM/IEEE MOBICOM, pp. 207–218, 1999Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerla, M., Lee, S.J., Su, W.: On-demand multicast routing protocol (ODMRP) for ad hoc networks. Internet draft, draft-ietfmanet-odmrp-02.txt (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kar, B., Kung, H.T.: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. ACM/IEEE MOBICOM, pp. 243–254, (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuhn, F., Wattenhofer, R., Zhang, Y., Zollinger, A.: Geometric ad-hoc routing: of theory and practice. In: International Symposium on the Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2003Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, J., et al.: A scalable location service for geographic ad hoc routing”, in ACM/IEEE MOBICOM, pp. 120–130, 2000Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu, C.W., Tay, Y.C., Toh, C.K.: Ad hoc multicast routing protocol utilizing increasing id- numbers (AMRIS) functional specification. Internet draft, draft-ietf-manet-amris-spec-00.txt, 1998 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Devarapalli, V., Selcuk, A.A., Sidhu, D.: MZRP: a multicast protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. Internet draft, draft-vijayf-manet-mzr-01.txt (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J.: Madruga, E.L: the core-assisted mesh protocol. IEEE J-SAC, 17(8), 1380–1994 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, S.J., Gerla, M., Chiang, C.C.: On-demand multicast routing protocol. In: Proceedings of IEEE WCNC 1999, pp. 1298–1302, 1999Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ozaki, T., Kim, J.B., Suda, T.: Bandwidth efficient multicast routing protocol for ad hoc networks. Proceedings of IEEE ICCCN 1999, pp. 10–17, 1999Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sinha, P., Sivakumar, R., Bharghavan, V.: MCEDAR: multicast core extraction distributed ad hoc routing. Proceedings of IEEE WCNC 1999,pp. 1313–1317, 1999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Rajeswari
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Uma Maheswari
    • 2
  • S. Bhuvaneshwari
    • 1
  1. 1.Angel College of Engineering & TechnologyTirupurIndia
  2. 2.Info Institute of EngineeringCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations