Abstract
Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EEDCR), which was first described in the late 1980s [1], has gained considerable popularity in the recent two decades with the advent of the rigid fiber-optic endoscope and its use in paranasal sinus surgery. It avoids a facial incision, disruption of the medial canthal tendon, injury to the terminal branch of facial nerve, or a full thickness (skin to mucosa) ring contracture over the osteotomy site, all of which may lead to secondary lacrimal pump failure despite anatomical patency. Endoscopic DCR is not contraindicated during active dacryocystitis (minimal risk of fistula formation), presumably allowing faster healing process, and is perceivably less traumatic compared to external DCR. Recent published series of EEDCR reported higher success rates up to 95 % as compared to prior studies [2]. This likely reflects an increased experience with endoscopic instrumentation and anatomy among lacrimal surgeons and an improved understanding and control of postoperative mucosal healing [3]. The key to successful EEDCR relies on atraumatic creation of a large osteotomy [3] with adequate superior bony clearance, complete marsupialization of the lacrimal sac [4], maximal preservation of the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosa with close approximation of the mucosal edges [2, 5], as well as regular endoscopic monitoring of ostial healing during the early postoperative period.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
McDonogh M, Meiring J. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103:585–7.
Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:76–83.
Goldberg RA. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: is it really less successful? Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:108–10.
Davies MJ, Lee S, Lemke S, et al. Predictors of anatomical patency following primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a pilot study. Orbit. 2011;30:49–53.
Codere F, Denton P, Corona J. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a modified technique with preservation of the nasal and lacrimal mucosa. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26:161–4.
Wormald PJ, Kew J, Van Hasselt CA. The intranasal anatomy of the nasolacrimal sac in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:307–10.
Caversaccio M, Hausler R. Insertion of double bicanalicular silicone tubes after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in lacrimal canalicular stenosis: a 10-year experience. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2006;68:266–9.
Chong KK, Lai FH, Ho M, Luk A, Wong BW, Young A. Randomized trial on silicone Intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2139–45.
Ali MJ, Mariappan I, Maddileti S, et al. Mitomycin C in dacryocystorhinostomy: the search for the right concentration and duration – a fundamental study on human nasal mucosal fibroblasts. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29:469–74.
Huang J, Malek J, Chin D, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes for endoscopic versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit. 2014;33:81–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chong, K.KL. (2015). Primary Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy. In: Javed Ali, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2019-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2020-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)