Advertisement

Comparative Study of PCM, LPC, and CELP Speech Coders Used for VoIP Applications

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 308)

Abstract

The quality of the speech signal in a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) is governed by the speech coding technique employed. Currently, various standard coders such as FS-1015 (LPC-10), ITU-G.711, and FS-1016 (ITU-G.728) are used to digitize the speech signal. This paper analyzes the performance of the above coders by comparing the coding capabilities of the coders on two Hindi and two English language sentences. The performance is then evaluated in terms of compression ratio (CR), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE).

Keywords

VoIP LPC-10 G.711 G.728 CR PSNR NRMSE 

References

  1. 1.
    Ogunfunmi, T., Narasimha, M.J.: Speech over VoIP networks: Advanced signal processing and system implementation. IEEE Circ. Syst. Mag. 2(2), 35–55 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ray, M., Chandra, M., Patil, B.P.: Evaluation of CDMA microwave links at different environments for VoIP applications. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 1(8), 508–512 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ali, A.A., Vassilaras, S., Ntagkounakis, K.: A comparative study of bandwidth requirements of VoIP codecs over WiMax access networks. IEEE 3rd International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies, pp. 197–203 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sunny, S., David, S.P., Jacob, K.P.: Recognition of speech signals: an experiment comparison of linear predictive coding and discrete wavelet transforms. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 4, (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tandel, M., Shah, V., Patel, B.: Implementation of CELP CODER and to evaluate the performance in terms of bit rate, coding delay and quality of speech. In: 3rd IEEE International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, pp. 86–89. Apr 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ambika, D., Radha, V.: A comparative study between discrete wavelet transform and linear predictive coding. IEEE World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies, pp. 965–969 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Najih, A.M.M.A., Ramli, A.R., Ibrahim, A., Syed, A.R.: Comparing speech compression using wavelets with other speech compression schemes. In: IEEE Proceedings of Student Conference on Research and Development, pp. 55–58 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Campbell, P.J., Tremain, T.E.: Voiced/unvoiced classification of speech with applications to the U.S. government LPC-10E algorithm. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 473–476 (1986)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Ray, A.K., Acharya, T.: Information Technology: Principles and Applications. Prentice-Hill of India Private Limited, New Delhi (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringBirla Institute of Technology, MesraRanchiIndia

Personalised recommendations