Time-Delay Approximation: Its Influence on the Structure and Performance of the IMC-PI/PID Controller

  • P. V. Gopi Krishna Rao
  • M. V. Subramanyam
  • K. Satyaprasad
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 308)

Abstract

Proportional integral (PI) and proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers have been at the heart of control engineering practice for several decades. 95 % of the controllers employed in the industry are PI/PID. In process control, one often encounters systems described by transfer functions with time delays, which become transcendental functions. The design of the controller demands the rational transfer function approximation of the time-delay term. This paper focuses on the effect of time-delay approximation techniques, viz. Taylor series expansion and Padé approximation, on the structure and performance of PI/PID controllers designed with Internal Model Control (IMC). The performance of the PI/PID controllers was tested in simulation environment on various processes with time delay. For uniform comparison, the controllers were tuned to have a same robustness measure, in terms of maximum sensitivity (M S). The results indicate, irrespective of time-delay approximation considered, the controllers provide good set point tracking and poor disturbance rejection.

Keywords

Time delay Padé approximation Taylor series Internal model control PI/PID Disturbance Set point 

References

  1. 1.
    O’Dwyer, A.: PI and PID controller tuning rules: an overview and personal perspective. In: Proceedings of the IET Irish Signals and Systems Conference, pp. 161–166, Dublin Institute of Technology, June 2006Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Åström, K.J., Hägglund, T.: PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning, Instrument Society of America. Research Triangle Park, NC (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, M., Shamsuzzoha, M., Vu, T.N.L.: IMC-PID approach: an effective way to get an analytical design of robust PID controller. International Conference on Control Automation and Systems, pp. 2861–2866. Seoul, Korea, Oct 2008Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pai, Neng-Sheng, Chang, Shih-Chi, Huang, Chi-Tsung: Tuning PI/PID controllers for integrating processes with dead time and inverse response by simple calculations. Journal Process Control 20(6), 726–733 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanta, V., Procházka, A.: Rational approximation of time delay. Institute of Chemical Technology in Prague. Department of computing and control engineering. Technická 5, 166 28 Praha 6 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silva, G.J., Datta, A., Bhattacharyya, S.P.: Controller design via Padé approximation can lead to instability. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Orlando, Florida USA, Dec 2001Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saxena, Sahaj, Yogesh, V., Hote, : Advances in internal model control technique: a review and future prospects. IETE Tech. Rev. 29, 461–472 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morari, M., Zafiriou, E.: Robust Process Control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1989)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shamsuzzoha, M., Lee, M.: Design of advanced PID controller for enhanced disturbance rejection of second-order processes with time delay. AIChE J. 54(6), 1526–1536 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shamsuzzoha, M., Lee, M.: IMC: PID Controller Design for Improved Disturbance Rejection of Time-Delayed Processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46(7), 2077–2091 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rivera, D.E., Morari, M., Skogestad, S.: Internal model control. 4. PID controller design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 25, 252–265 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horn, I.G., Arulandu, J.R., Christopher, J.G., VanAntwerp, J.G., Braatz, R.D.: Improved filter design in internal model control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 3437–3441 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garcia, C.E., Morari, M.: Internal model controls 1. A unifying review and some new results. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 21, 308 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, Y., Park, S., Lee, M., Brosilow, C.: PID controller tuning for desired closed-loop responses for SI/SO systems. AIChE J. 44, 106–115 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shamsuzzoha, M., Lee, M.: Analytical design of enhanced PID filter controller for integrating and first order unstable processes with time delay. Chem. Eng. Sci. 63, 2717–2731 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seborg, D.E., Edgar, T.F., Mellichamp, D.A.: Process Dynamics and Control, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pekar, L., Kureckova, E.: Rational approximations for time-delay systems: case studies. Mathematical Methods and Techniques in Engineering and Environmental Science. pp. 217–222. ISBN: 978-1-61804-046-6Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Partington, J.R.: Some frequency-domain approaches to the model reduction of delay systems. Ann. Rev. Control 28, 65–73 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Battle, C., Miralles, A.: On the approximation of delay elements by feedback. Automatica 36(5), 659–664 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rao, P.V.G.K., Subramanyam, M.V., Satyaprasad, K.: Model based tuning of PID controller. J. Control Instrum. 4(1), 16–22 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shamsuzzoha, M., Lee, S., Lee, M.: Analytical design of PID controller cascaded with a lead-lag filter for time-delay processes. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 26(3), 622–630 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen, D., Seborg, D.E.: PI/PID controller design based on direct synthesis and disturbance rejection. Ind. Eng. Chem. 41, 4807–4822 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. V. Gopi Krishna Rao
    • 1
  • M. V. Subramanyam
    • 2
  • K. Satyaprasad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ECEJNTUKKakinadaIndia
  2. 2.Shantiram Engineering CollegeNandyalIndia

Personalised recommendations