An Empirical Analysis of Training Algorithms of Neural Networks: A Case Study of EEG Signal Classification Using Java Framework

  • Sandeep Kumar Satapathy
  • Alok Kumar Jagadev
  • Satchidananda Dehuri
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 309)

Abstract

With the pace of modern lifestyle, about 40–50 million people in the world suffer from epilepsy—a disease with neurological disorder. Electroencephalography (EEG) is the process of recording brain signals that generate due to a small amount of electric discharge in brain. This may occur due to the information flow among several neurons. Therefore, in every minute, analysis of EEG signal can solve much neurological disorders like epilepsy. In this paper, a systematic procedure for analysis and classification of EEG signal is discussed for identification of epilepsy in a human brain. The analysis of EEG signal is made through a series of steps from feature extraction to classification. Feature extraction from EEG signal is done through discrete wavelet transform (DWT), and the classification task is carried out by MLPNN based on supervised training algorithms such as backpropagation, resilient propagation (RPROP), and Manhattan update rule. Experimental study in a Java platform confirms that RPROP trained MLPNN to classify EEG signal is promising as compared to back-propagation or Manhattan update rule trained MLPNN.

References

  1. 1.
    Sanei, S., Chambers, J.A.: EEG Signal Processing. Wiley Publications, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Niedermeyer, E., Lopes da Silva, F.: Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins, 2004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Towle, V.L., Bolaños, J., Suarez, D., Tan, K., Grzeszczuk, R., Levin, D.N., Cakmur, R., Frank, S.A., Spire, J.P.: The spatial location of EEG electrodes: locating the best fitting sphere relative to cortical anatomy. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neuro. Physiol. 86(1), 1–6 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aurlien, H., Gjerde, I.O., Aarseth, J.H., Karlsen, B., Skeidsvoll, H., Gilhus, N.E.: EEG background activity described by a large computerized database. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115(3), 665–673 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guler, I., Beyli, E.D.U.: Multi-class support vector machines for EEG-signals classification. IEEE Trans. Inf Technol. Biomed. 11(2), 117–126 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naderi, M.A., Homayoun, M. N., Analysis and classification of EEG signals using spectral analysis and recurrent neural networks. In: International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME), pp. 1–4 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guler, N.F., Ubeyli, E.D., Gule, I.: Recurrent neural network employing Lyapunov exponents for EEG signal classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 29, 506–514 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Subasi, A., Ismail Gursoy, M.: EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 8659–8666 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Durand, S., Froment, J.: Artifacts Free signal denoising with wavelets. In: IEEE, published in the 2001 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 6, pp. 3685–3688 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ocak, H.: Optimal classification of epileptic seizures in EEG using wavelet analysis and genetic algorithm. Sig. Process. 88, 1858–1867 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sifuzzaman1, M., Islam1, M.R., Ali, M.Z.: Application of wavelet transform and its advantages compared to fourier transform. J. Phys. Sci. 13, 121–134 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Subasi, A., Ercelebi, E.: Classification of EEG signals using neural network and logistic regression. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 78, 87–99 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riedmiller, M., Braun, H.: A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm. In: IEEE Internal Conference on Neural Networks, vol 1, pp. 586–591 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arab, M.R., Suratgar, A.A., Martínez Hernández, V.M., Ashtiani, A.R.: Electroencephalogram signals processing for the diagnosis of petit mal and grand mal epilepsies using an artificial neural network. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 8(1), 120–129 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hagan, M.T., Menhaj, M.B.: Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 5(6), 989–993 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adeli, H., Zhou, Z., Dadmehr, N.: Analysis of EEG records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform. J. Neurosci. Methods 123, 69–87 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Acir, N., Oztura, I., Kuntalp, M., Baklan, B., Guzelis, C.: Automatic detection of epileptiform events in EEG by a three-stage procedure based on artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52(1), 30–40 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D’Alessandro, M., Esteller, R., Vachtsevanos, G., Hinson, A., Echauz, A., Litt, B.: Epileptic seizure prediction using hybrid feature selection over multiple intracranial EEG electrode contacts: a report of four patients. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50(5), 603–615 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nigam, V.P., Graupe, D.: A neural-network-based detection of epilepsy. Neurol. Res. 26(1), 55–60 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Subasi, A.: Automatic detection of epileptic seizure using dynamic fuzzy neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 31, 320–328 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandeep Kumar Satapathy
    • 1
  • Alok Kumar Jagadev
    • 1
  • Satchidananda Dehuri
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute of Technical Education and ResearchSOA UniversityBhubaneswarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Systems EngineeringAjou UniversityWoncheon-DongSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations