ACO Based QoS Aware Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks with Heterogeneous Nodes

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 298)

Abstract

Most of the existing routing protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) consider homogeneous nodes wherein all sensor nodes have the same capabilities in terms of sensing, communication and computation capabilities. However, a homogeneous sensor network may suffer from poor performance and scalability. This paper presents an ant-based QoS routing protocol for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks (HWSN). The key feature of the protocol is its ability to meet diverse QoS requirements posed by different kinds of traffic generated due to heterogeneous nature of nodes thus maximizing network performance and its utilization. We have evaluated and compared the proposed novel solution with EEABR and AODV for environments of dynamic topology.

Keywords

Wireless sensor networks Wireless multimedia sensor networks Heterogeneous wireless sensor networks QoS Ant routing 

References

  1. 1.
    Gurses E, Akan OB (2005) Multimedia communication in wireless sensor networks. Ann Telecommun 60(7–8):799–827Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Misra S, Dhurandher SK, Obaidat MS, Gupta P, Verma K, Narula P (2010) An ant swarm-inspired energy-aware routing protocol for wireless ad-hoc networks. J Syst Softw 83:2188–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hadjidj A, Bouabdallah A, Challal Y (2011) HDMRP: an efficient fault-tolerant multipath routing protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on heterogeneous networking for quality, reliability, security and robustness (Qshine), vol 74, Houston, USA, Nov 2010, Published in Springer LNICST, pp 469–482Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen L, Heinzelman WB (2005) QoS-aware routing based on bandwidth estimation for mobile ad hoc networks. J Sel Areas Commun 23(3):561–572Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    He T, Stankovic JA, Lu C, Abdelzaher TF (2005) A spatiotemporal communication protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 16(10):995–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Felemban E, Lee C, Ekici E (2006) MMSPEED: multipath multi-SPEED protocol for QoS guarantee of reliability and timeliness in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 5(6):738–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamid M, Alam M, Seon HC (2008) Design of a QoS-aware routing mechanism for wireless multimedia sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE global telecommunications conference, pp 800–805Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kandris D, Tsagkaropoulos M, Politis I, Tzes A, Kotsopoulos S (2011) Energy efficient and perceived QoS aware video routing over wireless multimedia sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw 9:591–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xue Y, Ramamurthy B, Vuran MC (2011) SDRCS: a service-differentiated real-time communication scheme for event sensing in wireless sensor networks. Comput Netw 55:3287–3302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun W, Song Y, Chen M (2010) A load-balanced and energy-aware routing metric for wireless multimedia sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IET 3rd international conference on wireless, mobile and multimedia networks (ICWMMN 2010), Beijing, China, pp 21–24Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin K, Rodrigues JJPC, Ge H, Xiong N, Liang X (2011) Energy efficiency QoS assurance routing in wireless multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Syst J 5(4):495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bi J, Li Z, Wang R (2010) An ant colony optimization-based load balancing routing algorithm for wireless multimedia sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international conference on communication technology (ICCT’10), pp 584–587Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu X, Luo J, Huang J (2011) An ant colony optimization-based QoS routing algorithm for wireless multimedia sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd international conference on communication software and networks (ICCSN), pp 37–41Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cobo L, Quintero A, Pierre S (2010) Ant-based routing for wireless multimedia sensor networks using multiple QoS metrics. Comput Netw 54:2991–3010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huaihu C (2012) A QoS routing algorithm based on ant colony optimization and mobile agent. Procedia Eng 29:1208–1212. In: International workshop on information and electronics engineering (IWIEE)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu M, Xu S, Sun S (2012) An agent-assisted QoS-based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. J Netw Comput Appl 35:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ribeiro LB, Castro MF (2010) BiO4SeL: a bio-inspired routing algorithm for sensor network lifetime optimization. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on telecommunications, pp 728–724Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Camilo T, Carreto C, Silva J, Boavida F (2006) An energy-efficient ant-based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the ant colony optimization and swarm intelligence, Brussels, Belgium, pp 49–59Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Di Caro G, Ducatelle F, Gambardella LM (2005) AntHocNet: an adaptive nature inspired algorithm for routing in mobile ad hoc networks. Eur Trans Telecommun 16(2):443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    The Network Simulator ns2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hindu College of EngineeringSonepatIndia
  2. 2.National Institute of TechnologyKurukshetraIndia
  3. 3.Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and TechnologyMurthal, SonepatIndia

Personalised recommendations