Predictive Methods for Organic Spectral Data Simulation

  • Muthukumarasamy Karthikeyan
  • Renu Vyas


New chemical entities (NCE) with potential bioactivity are synthesized, isolated, and thoroughly characterized for structure elucidation and purity before being subjected to further research. Spectroscopy is one of the most powerful means to deduce the correct structure and configuration of a compound or a fragment. In organic synthesis, the compounds are usually characterized by the spectral techniques such as ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), infrared (IR), mass spectrometry (MS), X-ray, etc. NMR and MS methods are employed in fragment-based drug discovery approaches to identify compounds from a high-throughput screen or a proteomics experiment. However, it is not possible to manually interpret the complex spectral data that require sophisticated computational tools for characterization. These tools aid in spectra analysis, peaks assignment, intensity, etc. and thereby annotate the compound with the appropriate functional group and fragments. The prediction algorithms are developed based on principles of quantum chemistry, machine learning, or simple database/pattern match-based methods. Some of the methods using quantum chemistry are accurate; however, they require more computational time; on the other hand, the machine learning methods such as neural network are faster but require more experimental data for improving their prediction capability. So, there is a trade-off between speed and accuracy, and the user has to decide his/her preference. A number of spectra prediction tools, commercial as well as open source, are discussed in this chapter accompanied with detailed tutorials on the use of some of them. To manage the data, many online servers and spectral databases are available today and a brief introduction to them is also provided. Here, we also describe an in-house-developed carbon and proton NMR chemical shift-based binary fingerprints and their use in virtual screening.


NMR spectral data Binary fingerprints Chemical shift prediction Classification Virtual screening 


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Pavia DL, Lampman GM, Kriz GS, Vyvyan JR (eds) (2009) Introduction to spectroscopy. Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gunther H (1995) NMR spectroscopy: basic principles, concepts and applications in organic chemistry. WileyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McDonald RS (1986) Review: infrared spectrometry. Anal Chem 58:1906–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schoonheydt RA (2010) UV-VIS-NIR spectroscopy and microscopy of heterogeneous catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 39:5051–5066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watson JT, Sparkman D (2007) Introduction to mass spectrometry. WileyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smyth MS, Martin JHJ (2000) X Ray crystallography. Mol Path 53:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dyer JR (1965) Applications of organic spectroscopy of compounds. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverstein RRM, Webster FK, Kiemle DJ (2005) The spectrometric identification of organic compounds. WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalsi PS (2004) Spectroscopy of organic compounds. New age international publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calloway D (1997) Beer-Lambert law. J Chem Educ 74:744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stuart B (2004) Infrared spectroscopy fundamentals and applications. Wiley, EnglandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karthikeyan M, Imran (unpublished results)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamm P, Zani M (2011) Concepts and methods of 2D Infra red spectroscopy. Cambridge University press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Callaghan PT (1991) Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Oxford Science Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keeler J (2010) Understanding NMR spectroscopy. WileyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richards SA, Hollerton JC (2010) Essential practical NMR for organic chemistry. WileyGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campos-Olivas R (2011) NMR screening and hit validation in fragment based drug discovery. Curr Top Med Chem 11(1):43–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stothers J (1972) Carbon 13 NMR spectroscopy, vol 24 organic chemistry. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clayden J, Greeves N, Warren S (2012) Organic chemistry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hamming MC, Foster NC (1972) Interpretation of mass spectroscopy of organic compounds. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berardi MJ, Shih WM, Harrison SC, Chou JJ (2011) Mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 structure determined by NMR molecular fragment searching. Nature 476:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fernandez C, Jahnke W (2004) New Approaches for NMR screening in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today Technol 1(3):277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu P, Lu M, Zheng Q et al (2013) Recent advances of electrochemical mass spectrometry. AnalystGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kang EH, Lee EY, Lee YJ et al (2008) Clinical features and risk factors of postsurgical gout. Ann Rheum Dis 67:1271–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taber DF (2007) Organic Spectroscopic structure determination: a problem based learning approach. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Buchnicek J (1950) Colchicine in ripening seeds of the wild saffron (Colchicum autumnale L). Pharm Acta Helv 25:389–401Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shuker SB, Hajduk PJ, Meadows RP, Fesik SW (1996) Discovering high affinity ligands for proteins SAR by NMR. Science 274(5292):1531–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rynchnovsky SD (2006) Predicting NMR spectra by computational Methods: structure revision of hexacyclinol. Org Lett 8:2995–2898Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Elyashberg M, Blinov K, Smurnyy Y, Churanova T, Williams A (2010) Empirical and DFT GIAO quantum mechanical methods of 13C chemical shifts prediction competitors or collaborators. Magnet Reson Chem 48(3):209–229Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hu Y, Li Y, Lam H (2011) A semiemprirical approach for predicting unobserved peptide MS MS spectra from spectral libraries. Proteomics 11(4702):4711Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Charpenier T (2011) The PAW/GIPAW approach for computing NMR parameters: a new dimension added to NMR study of solids. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 40(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Will M, Joachim R (1997) Spec-Solv an innovation at work. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:403–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blinov KA, Smurnyy YD, Elyashberg ME, Churanova TS, Kvasha M, Steinbeck C, Lefebvre BA, Williams AJ (2008) Performance validation of neural network of 13C NMR prediction using a publicly available data source. J Chem Inf Model 48:550–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pretsch E, Furst A, Bodertscher M, Burgin R (1992) C13Shift: A computer program for the prediction of 13CNMR spectra based on an open set of additivity rules. J Chem Inf Model 32:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
    Shen Y, Lange O, Delaglio F, Rossi P, Aramini JA, Liu G, Eletsky A, Wu Y, Singarapu KK, Lemak A, Ignatchenko A, Arrowsmith CH, Szyperski T, Montelione GT, Baker D, Bax A (2008) Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(12):4685–4690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
    Wiberg KB, Hammer JD, Zilm KW, Cheeseman JR (1999) NMR chemical shifts. 3. A comparison of acetylene, allene, and the higher cumulenes. J Org Chem 64:6394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Spanton SG, Whittern D (2009) The development of an NMR chemical shift prediction application with the accuracy necessary to grade proton NMR spectra for identity. Magn Reson Chem 47(12):1055–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Raymond AJ, Mehdi M (2004) The prediction of 1H NMR chemical shifts in organic compounds. Spectrosc Eur 16(4):20–22Google Scholar
  47. 47. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
  48. 48.
    Roesky HW, Walawalkar MG, Ramaswamy M (2001) Is water a friend or foe in organometallic chemistry? The case of group 13 organometallic compounds. Acc Chem Res 34(3):201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gordon MS, Schmidt MW (2005) Advances in electronic structure theory: GAMESS a decade later. In: Dykstra CE, Frenking G, Kim KS, Scuseria GE (eds) Theory and applications of computational chemistry: the first forty years, pp. 1167–1189. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pagenkopf B (2005) ACD/HNMR Predictor and ACD/CNMR Predictor. J Am Chem Soc 127(9):3232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chemicke L (2008) Drasar, Pavel Bulletin presents. Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of ACD/1D NMR Assistant, ACD/1D NMR Processor, and ACD/Labs NMR Predictor software. 102(4):299–300Google Scholar
  52. 52.
  53. 53.
    Wang H (2005) Application of chemdraw nmr tool: correlation of program-generated 13c chemical shifts and pKa values of para-substituted benzoic acids. J Chem Educ 82(9):1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
  55. 55.
    Saitoa H, Andob I, Ramamoorthy A (2010) Tensors the heart of NMR. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 57(20):181–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mason J (1993) Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 2:285Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Facelli JC (2011) Chemical shift tensors: theory and application to molecular structure problems. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 58(3–4):176–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
  59. 59.
    Nikolic G, Shimazaki T, Yoshihiro A (eds) (2011) Fourier transforms, Gaussian and Fourier Transform (GFT) method and screened Hartree-Fock exchange potential for first-principles band structure calculations. 15–36Google Scholar
  60. 60.
  61. 61.
    Francesco RD, Stener M, Fronzoni G (2012) Theoretical study of near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure spectra of metal phthalocyanines at C and N K-edges. J Phys Chem A 116:2285–22894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Cobas C, Seoane F, Dominiguez S, Sykora S, Davies AN (2011) A new approach to improving automated analysis of proton NMR spectra through global spectral deconvolution(GSD) 23(1)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jens M, Maier W, Martin W, Reinhard M (2002) Using neural networks for 13C NMR chemical shift prediction-comparison with traditional methods. J Magn Reson 157(2):242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pearlman DA (1996) Fingar: a new genetic algorithm based method for fitting NMR data. J Biomol NMR 8(1):49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
  66. 66.
    Yang S, Bax A (2010) SPARTA + A modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by an artificial neural network. J Biomol NMR 48(1):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Plainchont B, Nuzillard JM (2013) Structure verification though computer assisted spectral assignment of NMR spectra. Magn Reson Chem 51(1):54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bertini I, Felli IC, Kuemmerle R, Moskau D, Pierattelli R (2004) 13C-13C NOESY: an attractive alternative for studying large macromolecules. J Am Chem Soc 126(2):464–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kuhn S, Schlorer NE (2012) NMR structure determination in synthetic chemistry. Nachrichten aus der Cemie 60(11):1106–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
  71. 71. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
  72. 72.
    Kazutoshi T, Hayamizu K, Shuitiro O (1991) Analytical sciences, spectral database system on PC with CD-ROM 7 (Suppl., Proc. Int. Congr. Anal. Sci., Pt. 1), 711–712Google Scholar
  73. 73.
  74. 74.
    Nitsche C (1996) SciFinder 2.0: Preserving the partnership between chemistry and the information professional. Database (Oxford) 19:51Google Scholar
  75. 75. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
  76. 76.
    unpublished resultsGoogle Scholar
  77. 77. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
  78. 78. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
  79. 79. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
  80. 80.
  81. 81.
    Toukach FV, Ananikov VP (2013) Recent advances in computational prediction of NMR parameters for the structural elucidation of carbohydrates: methods and limitations. Chem Soc Rev 42:8376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Digital Information Resource CentreNational Chemical LaboratoryPuneIndia
  2. 2.Scientist (DST) Division of Chemical Engineering and Process DevelopmentNational Chemical LaboratoryPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations