Advertisement

Object Recognition Using Gabor Wavelet Features with Various Classification Techniques

  • Divya Sahgal
  • Manoranjan Parida
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 258)

Abstract

Object recognition is a process of detection and recognition of certain classes of objects like chairs, guitars, buildings etc., from an image or video sequence. Various researches have been done till now for extraction of object’s features from real-world images using various approaches varying from appearance based approaches like PCA, LDA, ICA, moment invariant, shape context, SIFT etc. or model based approaches. We used a well known model based approach “Gabor wavelet transform” to extract the features. Gabor wavelets exhibit desirable characteristics of spatial locality and orientation selectivity. It has several advantages against robustness, illumination, multi-resolution, and multi-orientation. Classifications of objects are important areas in a variety of fields, such as pattern recognition, artificial intelligence and vision analysis. So using the Gabor wavelet features classification is done by various well known classifiers like KNN, Neural Network (NN), SVM, and Naive Bayes classifiers. So results are compared using these classifiers as well we have given various pros and cons for these methods.

Keywords

Gabor wavelet KNN SVM NN Naive bayes 

References

  1. 1.
    Roach, J.W., Aggarwal, J.K.:Computer tracking of objects moving in space. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-1(2), 127–135 (1979)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yakimovsky, Y.: Boundary and object detection in real world images. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Including the 13th Symposium on Adaptive Processes, vol. 13, Part 1 (1974)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nahi, N.E., Lopez-Mora, S.: Estimation of object boundaries in noisy images. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 15th Symposium on Adaptive Processes, vol. 15, Part 1 (1976)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Würtz, R.P: Object recognition robust under translations, deformations, and changes in background. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19, 769–799 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ozer, H.U., Sundaram, R.: object recognition with generic self organizing feature extractors and fast gabor wavelet transform. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Florida, 12–17 August 2007Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dornaika, F., Chakik, F.: Efficient object detection and matching using feature classification. In: IEEE Conference Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2010 20th International Conference, pp. 3073–3076 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strickland R.N., Hahn H.I.: Wavelet transform methods for object detect ion and recovery. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 6(5), 724–735 1997Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xiaoyan, Z., Lingxia L., Xuchun Z.: An automatic video object segment action scheme. In: IEEE Conference Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ISPACS), 2007, International Symposium, pp. 272–275 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, P.-H., Lin, Y.-L., Chen, S.-C., Wu, C.-H., Tsai, C.-C., Hung, Y.-P.: Viewpoint-independent object detection based on two-dimensional contours and three-dimensional sizes. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 12(4), 1599–1608 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He L., Wang H., Zhang H.: Object detection by parts using appearance, structural and shape features. In: IEEE Conference Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), 2011 International Conference, pp. 489–494 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lei, B.J., Hendriks, E.A., Reinders, M.J.T.: On feature extraction from images. In: MCCWS Project Information and Communication Theory Group (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peter, M.R., Winter, M.: Survey of Appearance-Based Methods for Object Recognition. Survey available at www.icg.tu-graz.ac.at (2008)
  13. 13.
    Turk, M., Pentland, A.: Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 3, 71–86 (1991)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bartlett, M.S., Lades, H.M., Sejnowski, T.J.: Independent component representations for face recognition. In: Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 528–539 (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D.L. Swet and J. Weng, “Using discriminant eigenfeatures for image retrieval”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pp. 831–836, 1996Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Braithwaite, R.N., Bhanu, B.: Hierarchical Gabor filters for object detection in infrared images. In: Proceedings of CVPR ‘94, 1994 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, X., Bhanu, B.: Gabor wavelets for 3-D object recognition. In: Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, L., Qin, D.: The object tracking study based on the Gabor wavelet character. In: IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fergus, R., Perona, P.: Caltech object category datasets. http://www.vi-sion.caltech.edu/Image_Datasets/Caltech101/Caltech101.html (2003)
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Zhou, M.: Gabor-boosting face recognition. Thesis at det.tjfsu.edu.cn/faculty/Thesis.pdf. Sept 2008
  22. 22.
    Kepenekci, B.: Face recognition using Gabor wavelets transform. Thesis at citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.100.pdf. Sept 2001
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., Vapnik, V.: A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Pittsburgh, pp. 144–152 (1992)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burges, C.: A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2, 121–127 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Akay, M.F.: Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 3240–3247 (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vinay Kumar B, “A Thesis on Face Recognition Using Gabor Wavelets”, Visvesvaray echnological University, Belgaum, 2006Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Neural Network, http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/compsci/neural-networks-history.htmlGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. Warsop, S. Singh, “A survey of object recognition methods for automatic asset d e- tection in high-definition video”, IEEE 9th International Conference on Cybernetic In- telligent Systems (CIS) 2010, pp. 1 – 6, 2010Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. Modegi, “Small object recognition techniques based on structured template match- ing for high-resolution satellite images”, IEEE conference on SICE, pp. 2168 – 2173, 2008Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Laika, A., Stechele, W.: A review of different object recognition methods for the ap- plication in driver assistance systems. IEEE conference on Image Analysis for Multi- media Interactive Services 2007, 10 (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Martin Garcia Keller, “Matching Algorithms and Feature Match Quality Measures for Model-Based Object Recognition with Applications to Automatic Target Recognition”, Thesis at www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA440328, 1999Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fergus R.: Visual object category recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Transportation SystemsIIT RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations