Network Connectivity in VANETs

  • Ranjeet Singh Tomar
  • Brijesh Kumar Chaurasia
  • Shekhar Verma
  • Rajendra Singh Kushwah
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 258)


VANETs are targeted to improve the traffic safety and driving experience on the road. Vehicular connectivity based communication in VANETs to be used for safety critical, safety related and non safety related messages dissemination in the networks. A key challenge in developing such network connectivity mechanism is that quickly adaptation the changes in the network topology due to the vehicular mobility. In this work we investigate the feasibility of developing the location based network connectivity for communication in VANETs in the spatial localized time domain for safety applications. The vehicular mobility and maximization of network connectivity duration between the vehicles have been identified as two important design goals in this work. However, these two goals are in conflict in nature, which makes it challenging to achieve both of these two goals in VANETs. To balance the trade-off between vehicular mobility and network connectivity, the average number of vehicle links, average link duration and connection time of each vehicle is ensured and subject to this constraint, aggregate network connectivity is maximized for efficient communication in VANETs.


Medium access control (MAC) Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) Vehicular connectivity 


  1. 1.
    Malta, L., Miyajima, C., Takeda, K.: A study of driver behavior under potential threats in vehicle traffic. IEEE Trans. Intell. Trans. Syst. 10(2), 201–210 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biswas, S., Tatchikou, R., Dion, F.: Vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication protocols for enhancing highway traffic safety. IEEE Commun. Mag. 44(1), 74–82 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kerner, B.S.: Introduction to Modern Traffic Flow Theory and Control: The Long Road to Three-Phase Traffic Theory, pp. 1–255. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shiller, Z., Sundar, S.: Emergency lane-change maneuvers of autonomous vehicles. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. ASME 120(1), 37–44 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hossein, J., Kosmatopoulos, E.B., Ioannou, P.A.: Collision avoidance analysis for lane changing and merging. IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech 49(6), 2295–2308 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ngai, D.C.K., Yung, N.H.C.: A multiple-goal reinforcement learning method for complex vehicle overtaking maneuvers. IEEE Trans. Intell. Trans. Syst. 12(2), 509–522 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abbas, M.K., Karsiti, M.N., Napiah, M., Samir, B.B.: Traffic light control via VANET system Architecture. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Technology and Applications, pp.174–179, Sept 2011Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durrani, S., Zhou, X., Chandra, A.: Effect of vehicle mobility on connectivity of vehicular ad hoc networks. Proceedings of the 72nd IEEE International Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), pp. 1–5, Sept 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jin, X., Su, W., Wei Y.: A study of the VANET connectivity by percolation theory. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Vehicular Communications System, pp. 85–89, Jan 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ranjeet Singh Tomar
    • 1
  • Brijesh Kumar Chaurasia
    • 1
  • Shekhar Verma
    • 2
  • Rajendra Singh Kushwah
    • 3
  1. 1.ITM UniversityGwaliorIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Information TechnologyAllahabadIndia
  3. 3.Institute of Technology & ManagementGwaliorIndia

Personalised recommendations