Advertisement

Comparative Analysis of Energy Efficient Protocols for Prolonged Life of Wireless Sensor Network

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 259)

Abstract

The efficiency of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) depends on the routing protocols used, since routing protocol provide the best possible data transmission route from sensor nodes to sink to save energy of nodes in the network. The clustering schemes enhance the network lifetime, raise the scalability and reduce the energy consumption of the sensor network. The work in this paper presents the comparative analysis of the energy efficient routing protocols for WSN such as SEP, TSEP and DSEP. The optimized routing protocol has been proposed on the basis of the network life time, stability and cluster head selection for efficient working of the sensor networks.

Keywords

Wireless sensor networks Clustering SEP TSEP DSEP 

References

  1. 1.
    Kumar, R., Tsiatsis, V., Srivastava, M.B.: Computation hierarchy for in-network processing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Wireless Networks and Application, San Diego, CA (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rhee, S., Seetharam, D., Liu, S.: Techniques for minimizing power consumption in low data-rate wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Atlanta, GA (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu, L., Wang, N., Zhang, W.: Deploying a heterogeneous wireless sensor network. In: Proceedings of International Conference on WiCom, pp. 2588–2591. Singapore (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Younis, O., Krunz, M., Ramasubramanian, S.: Node clustering in wireless sensor networks: recent developments and deployment challenges. In: IEEE Network, pp. 20–25. (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heinzelman, W.R., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS-33), pp. 1–10. (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindsey, S., Raghavenda, C.S.: PEGASIS: power efficient gathering in sensor information system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference on Big Sky, pp. 1125–1130. Montana, March 2002Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., Bestavros, A.: SEP: a stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: Second International Workshop on Sensor and Actor Network Protocols and Applications (SANPA 2004), 2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kashaf, A., Javaid, N., Khan, Z.A., Khan, I.A.: TSEP: threshold-sensitive stable election protocol for WSNs. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology, pp. 164–168. (2012) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bala, M., Awasthi, L.: Proficient D-SEP protocol with heterogeneity for maximizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. 7, 1–15 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saini, P., Sharma, A.K.: Energy efficient scheme for clustering protocol prolonging the lifetime of heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Comput. Appl. (0975–8887) 6, 31–36 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mao, Y., Liu, Z., Zhang, L., Li, X.: An effective data gathering scheme in heterogeneous energy wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, pp. 338–343. (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Islam, M.M., Matin, M.A., Mondol, T.K.: Extended stable election protocol (SEP) for three level hierarchical clustered heterogeneous WSN. In: Proceedings of IET Conference on WSS, London, 1–4 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, X.: A survey on clustering routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Sensors 12, 11113–11115Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manjeshwar, E., Agrawal, D.P.: TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), San Francisco, CA, USA, 2009–2015 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, Q., Qingxinand, Z., Mingwen, W.: Design of a distributed energy efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Comput. Commun. 29, 2230–2237 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khan, A.A., Javaid, N., Qasim, U., Lu, Z., Khan, Z.A.: HSEP: heterogeneity-aware hierarchical stable election protocol for WSNs. In: Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications, pp. 373–378. (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jaiswal, V.P.N., Garg, A.K.: An efficient protocol for reducing energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2, 530–533 (2012) (ISSN: 2248-9622)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringQuantum School of TechnologyRoorkeeIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringCT Institute of Engineering Management and TechnologyJalandharIndia

Personalised recommendations