Advertisement

A Novel Search Technique for Global Optimization

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 259)

Abstract

Solving non-linear optimization with more accuracy has become a challenge for the researchers. Evolutionary global search techniques today are treated as the alternate paradigm over the traditional methods for their simplicity and robust nature. However, if an evolutionary problem is computationally burdened both the human efforts and time will be wasted. In this paper a much simpler and more robust optimization algorithm called Drosophila Food-Search Optimization (DFO) Algorithm is proposed. This new technique is based on the food search behavior of the fruit fly called ‘Drosophila’. In order to evaluate the efficiency and efficacy of the DFO-algorithm, a set of 20 unconstrained benchmark problems have been used. The numerical results confirms the supremacy of DFO over the algorithms namely Hybrid Ant Colony-Genetic Algorithm (GAAPI), Level-Set evolution and Latin squares Algorithm (LEA), which are reported as the most efficient algorithms in the recent literature.

Keywords

Redundant search (RS) G-Protein-coupled-receptor (GPCR) Ligand and modified quadratic approximation (mQA) 

References

  1. 1.
    Alam, M.S., Islam, M., Yao, X., Murase, K.: Diversity guided evolutionary programming: a novel approach for continuous optimization. Appl. Soft Comput. 12(6), 1693–1707(2012) (Elsevier)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breast, J., Greiner, S., Boskovic, B., Mernik, M., Zumer, V.: Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: a comparative study on numerical benchmark problems. Trans Evol. Comput. IEEE. 10, 646–657 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gao, W., Liu, S.: Comput. Oper. Res. 39, 687–697 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Santoshi, K., Arakawa, M., Yamazaki, K.: Differential evolution as the global optimization technique and its application to structural optimization. Appl.Soft Comput. 11, 3792–3803 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Das, K.N., Singh, T.K.: Self adaptive hybridization of quadratic approximation with real coded genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of Seventh international conference of Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Application (BICTA2012). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 202, pp. 503–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neshat, M., Sepidnam, G., Sargolzaei, M.: Swallow swarm optimization algorithm: a new method to optimize. Neural Comput. Appl. (2012). doi: 10.1007/s00521-012-0939-9 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dethier, V.G.: The Hungary Fly. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stocker, R.F.: The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster : a review. Cell Tissue Res. 275, 3–26 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vosshal, L.B.: The molecular logic of olfaction in Drosophila. Chemo Senses 26, 207–213 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clyne, P.J., Warr, C.G., Freeman, M.R., Lessing, D., Kim, J., Carlson, J.R.: A novel family of divergent seven-transmembrane proteins: candidate odorant receptors in Drosophila. Neuron 416, 327–338 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lodish, H., Berk, A., Zipursky, L., Matsudaira, P., Batlimore, D., Darnell, J.: Molecular cell biology. Cell. Signal. 533–567 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, Z., He, J., Yao, X.: Making a difference to differential evolution. In: Michalewicz, Z., Siaary, P. (eds.) Advances in Meta-heuristics for Hard Optimization, pp. 397–414. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, Z., Tang, K., Yao, X.: Differential evolution for high-dimensional function optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC07), pp. 3523–3530. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Molina, D., Herrera, F., Lozano, M.: Adaptive local search parameters for real coded memetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC2005), pp. 888–895. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lozano, M., Herra, F., Krasnogor, N., Molina, D.: A real-coded memetic algorithms with crossover hill-climbing. Evol. Comput. 12, 273–302 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ciornei, I., Kyriakides, E.: Hybrid ant colony genetic algorithm (GAAPI) for global continuous optimization. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernetics: Part B Cybernatics 42, 234–244 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deep, K., Das, K.N.: Performance improvement of real coded genetic algorithm with quadratic approximation based hybridization. Int. J. Intell. Defense Support Syst. 2(4), 319–334 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsNational Institute of TechnologySilcharIndia

Personalised recommendations