The Turkish Model at Crossroads

  • Anita Sengupta


Chapter 6 looks at the reemergence of the model in the wake of the events in the Middle East in early 2011. The chapter examines how in the light of the search for alternatives the Turkish Model is once again projected as viable for the states that are now looking for alternatives.


Arab spring Middle East Democracy Ergenekon Gezi park European Union Constitutional amendment Democratic opening Kurds Alevis 


  1. Balci, B. (2013a). Protests a needed tonic for turkey’s democracy. World Politics Review, June 28.Google Scholar
  2. Balci, B. (2013b). Protests in Turkey; the end of the Turkish model? Foreign Policy Journal, June 29.Google Scholar
  3. Balci, B. (2013c). Turkish protests, Syria crisis will boost Turkey-PKK peace process. World Politics Review, Op Ed, July 29.Google Scholar
  4. BBC News Europe. (2013). Turkey Parliament curtails Army Powers, July 13.Google Scholar
  5. Birch, N. (2010). Turkey: Traditionalist opposition party attempts radical makeover, Eurasianet. Accessed November 15.
  6. Brunwasser, M. (2011). Turkey as a model democracy for Middle East the world. Global perspectives for an American audience. Accessed February 21.
  7. Ciddi, S. (2009). Kemalism in Turkish politics, the republican people’s party, secularism and nationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Dressler, M. (2013). Writing religion: The making of Turkish Alevi Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ergil, D. (2000). The Kurdish question in Turkey. Journal of Democracy, 11(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finkle A. (2011). Turkey’s Urbanization: The secret behind AKP’s third consecutive electoral success. Turkey Analyst, 4(12).Google Scholar
  11. Gol, A. (2011). Turkey’s search for identity: A Eurasian and Islamic country. In J. Kakonen, S. Chaturvedi & A. Sengupta (Eds.), Euro-Asia at crossroads, geopolitics, identity and discourse. Delhi: Shipra.Google Scholar
  12. Gul, A. (2004). Turkey’s role in a changing Middle East environment. Mediterranean Quarterly, 15(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster (p. 149).Google Scholar
  14. Hurriyet Daily News. (2011a). Turkish charter panel convenes as cracks emerge, October 18.Google Scholar
  15. Hurriyet Daily News. (2011b). New charter committee kicks off in shadow of deadly attacks, Wednesday, October 19.Google Scholar
  16. Hurriyet Daily News. (2013). Turkish Parliament OKs change on coup pretext article, Monday, July 15.Google Scholar
  17. Jenkins, G. (2010). Turkey’s constitutional amendments: One step forward, two steps back? Turkey Analyst, 3(6).Google Scholar
  18. Jenkins, G. (2013). Calculating ambivalence: The imrali process and the balance between Kurdish and Turkish nationalist violence. Turkey Analyst, 6(9).Google Scholar
  19. Jones, D. (2011). Turkey: Time up for a Kurdish compromise. Eurasianet Weekly Digest, June 16.Google Scholar
  20. Karaveli H. M. (2009a). Ankara’s new Kurdish opening: Narrow room for maneuver. Turkey Analyst, 2(14).Google Scholar
  21. Karaveli, H. M. (2009b). Could Turkey’s glasnost establish equality as the founding principle Of the state? Turkey Analyst, 2(23).Google Scholar
  22. Karaveli, H. M., & Svante,C. E. (2011). Turkey and the Middle Eastern Revolts: Democracy or Islamism? Turkey Analyst, 4(3).Google Scholar
  23. Kardas, S. (2010). Constitutional amendments further polarize Turkish politics. Eurasia Daily Monitor, 7(87).Google Scholar
  24. Kaya, M. K. (2009). The AKP seeking to reinvent Turkey, is forced to tread carefully. Turkey Analyst, 2(21).Google Scholar
  25. Kunilholm, B. (2003). Turkey and the world in twenty five years : Thinking about the future. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102(2/3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mango, A. (2010). Introduction: Ataturk and Kemalism throughout the twentieth century. In K. O. Celia Kerslake & P. Robins (Eds), Turkey’s engagement with modernity: Conflict and change in the twentieth century. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  27. Moustakis, F., & Chaudhuri, R. (2005). The Turkish Kurdish relations and the European Union: An unprecedented shift in the Kemalist Paradigm? Mediterranean Quarterly, 16(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Narbone, L., & Tocci, N. (2009). Running around in circles? The cyclical relationship between Turkey and the European Union. In V. Susannah & I. Kostas (Eds.), Turkey’s road to European Union membership, national identity and political change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Oguzlu, T. (2011). Is the ‘Turkey as a model’ idea turning into reality from perception? ORSAM Foreign Policy Analysis, December 5.Google Scholar
  30. Oktem, K. (2011). Turkey remains an “angry nation” but could still serve as a democratic inspiration. The Turkey Analyst, 4(5).Google Scholar
  31. Rosenthal, A. (2013). Punishing journalists, subverting press freedom, The New York Times, The Opinion Pages, July 24.Google Scholar
  32. Sallam, H. (2013). Obsessed with Turkish models in Egypt. Jadaliyya, June 30.Google Scholar
  33. Sandrin, P. (2011). Unrest in the Middle East, the Turkish response and the Turkish Model. Political Reflection Quarterly, 2(1).Google Scholar
  34. Seibert, T. (2011). Election victory for Erdogan boosts Turkey’s standing in the region. The National, June 14.Google Scholar
  35. Sever, A. (2007). Turkey’s constraining position on Western reform initiatives in the Middle East. Mediterranean Quarterly, 18(4).Google Scholar
  36. Soler i Lecha, E. (2012). The conceptual architecture of Turkish foreign policy: An update in the light of regional turbulence. Documentos CIDOB, June 18.Google Scholar
  37. Somner, M. (2008). Defensive and liberal nationalisms: The Kurdish question and modernization/democratization. In E. F. Keyman (Eds.), Remaking Turkey, globalization, alternative modernities and democracy. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  38. Strauss, D. (2010). Turkey’s economy: Warning signs? Accessed September 2, 2010.Google Scholar
  39. Taspinar O. (2005). Kurdish nationalism and political Islam in Turkey. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Terzi, O. (2010). Introduction: Is it possible to speak of a process of europeanization in turkish foreign policy? In O. Terzi (Eds.), The influence of the European Union on turkish foreign policy. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  41. Trend (2011). US ambassador: Turkey may be an inspiration for Middle Eastern countries, March 8,
  42. Ulgen, S. (2011). From inspiration to aspiration: Turkey in the new Middle East. News Analysis, Carnegie Europe, December 7.Google Scholar
  43. Ugur, M., & Canefe, N. (2004). Turkey and the European integration, conclusions. In M. Ugur & N. Canefe (Eds.), Turkey and the European integration, accession prospects and issues. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Unver, A. H. (2013). The forgotten secular turkish model. Middle East Quarterly, 20(1).Google Scholar
  45. Vela, J. (2011). Turkey: How long before the boom turns to bust? Eurasianet, June 28.Google Scholar
  46. Varbanets P. (2009). A Turkic alliance: Possible alternative to Turkey’s unrealized EU membership? Central Asia and the Caucasus, 55(1).Google Scholar
  47. Verney, S. (2009). National identity and political change on Turkey’s road to EU membership. In V. Susannah & I. Kostas (Eds.), Turkey’s road to European union membership, national identity and political change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Villelabeitia, I. (2011). Scenarios–Why is Turkey June 12 vote important? Reuters, June 6.Google Scholar
  49. Walker, J. (2011). Turkey’s regional leadership in the Middle East: Principle or Realpolitik? Turkey Analyst, 4(6).Google Scholar
  50. Yavuz, H. M. (1999). Search for a new social contract in Turkey: Fethullah Gulen, the Virtue Party and the Kurds. SAIS Review, 19(1).Google Scholar
  51. Yavuz H. M. (2006). The role of the new bourgeoisie in the transformation of the Turkish Islamic Movement. In The Emergence of a New Turkey, democracy and the AKP party. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  52. Yegen, M. (2009a). Prospective Turks or pseudo citizens: Kurds in Turkey. Middle East Journal, 63(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yegen, M. (2009b). Banditry to disloyalty: The Kurdish question in Turkey. Accessed December 2.
  54. Yildiz, G. (2013). Ergenekon: The court case that changed Turkey. BBC News Europe, August 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies (MAKAIAS) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian StudiesKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations