What Is the “Turkish Model?”

  • Anita Sengupta


Chapter 2 deals with varied understandings of the “Turkish Model” and how these often failed to deal with the complex realities within Turkey. It is generally agreed that there is no consensus about what the Turkish Model means. Perception about this varies, as do its connotations. Some definitions are based on Turkey’s confinement of Islam to the private domain while others focus on a constitutional system that guarantees Turkey’s secular character and an acknowledgement of the role of armed forces as guardians and protectors of the constitution. Among diverse understandings of the model, American policy makers emphasized Turkey’s secular and multi-party electoral system along with its market economy. From the American perspective, the Turkish military is the balancer against radical groups both from Marxist and radical Islamic ideologies.


Turkish Model Ataturk Secularism Sufism New Islamism Turkish nationalism Zia Gokalp Democracy Conservative democracy Modernity Marginal groups Gezi Park 


  1. Ahmed, F. (1993). The making of modern Turkey. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bal, I. (2000). Turkey’s relations with the West and Turkic republics, The rise and fall of the Turkish Model. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. BBC News Europe (2013). Turkey unrest: Unions call strike over crackdown, June 17.Google Scholar
  4. Birch, N. (2009). Turkey: Educational reforms reflect changing balance of power in Ankara. Eurasia Insight, August 18, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Bozdogan, S., & Kasaba, R. (1997). Rethinking modernity and national identity in Turkey. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cagaptay, S. (2006). Islam, secularism and nationalism in modern Turkey, Who is a Turk? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Ciddi, S. (2009). Kemalism in Turkish politics, The Republican People’s Party, secularism and nationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cinar, M. (2008). The Justice and Development Party and the Kemalist establishment. In U. Cizre (Ed.), Secular and Islamic politics in Turkey, the making of the Justice and Development Party. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cinar, M., & Duran, B. (2008). The specific evolution of contemporary political Islam in Turkey and its ‘difference’. In U. Cizre (Ed.), Secular and Islamic politics in Turkey. The making of the Justice and Development Party. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cizre-Sakallioglu, U. (1996). Parameters and strategies of Islam–state interactions in Republican Turkey. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 28.Google Scholar
  11. Cizre, U., & Cinar, M. (2003). Turkey 2002: Kemalism, Islamism and politics in the light of the February 28 Process. South Asia Quarterly, 102.Google Scholar
  12. Dagi, I. D. (2005). Transformation of Islamic Political identity in Turkey: Rethinking the West and Westernization. Turkish Studies, 6.Google Scholar
  13. Dagi, I. D. (2006). The Justice and Development Party: Identity, politics and human rights discourse in the search for security and legitimacy. In M. H. Yavuz (Ed.), The emergence of a new Turkey: Democracy and the AK Party. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dagi, I. D. (2008). The future of Kemalism and the Istanbul Biennial. In Turkey between democracy and militarism, post Kemalist perspectives. Ankara: Orion Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Dagi, I. D. (2009). Islamic identity in post Kemalist Turkey and the West. Today’s Zaman, March 16, 2009.Google Scholar
  16. Dempsey, J. (2013). Judy asks: Is Erdogan finished?, Carnegie Europe, June 5.Google Scholar
  17. Duran, B. (2004). Islamist redefinition(s) of European and Islamic identities in Turkey. In M. Ugur & N. Canefe (Eds.), Turkey and European integration accession prospects and issues. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Duran, B. (2008). The Justice and Development Party’s new politics, steering towards conservative democracy, a revised Islamic agenda or management of new crisis?”. In U. Cizre (Ed.), Secular and Islamic politics in Turkey, the making of the Justice and Development Party. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Erdogan, M. (1999). Islam in Turkish politics: Turkey’s quest for democracy without Islam. Middle East Critique, 15, Fall.Google Scholar
  20. Frey, F. (1975). Patterns of elite politics in Turkey. In G. Lenczowski (Ed.), Political elites in the Middle East. Washington D.C. American Research Enterprise.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, T.L. (2013). Postcard from Turkey, The New York Times, The Opinion Pages, June 18.Google Scholar
  22. Gole, N. (1991). Modern Mahrem Medeniyet ve Ortunmei (Modern privacy, civilization and the veil). Istanbul: Métis.Google Scholar
  23. Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity versus postmodernity. New German Critique, 22.Google Scholar
  24. Ince, H. O., Yarali, A., & Ozsel, D. (2009). Customary killings in Turkey and Turkish modernization. Middle Eastern Studies, 45(4).Google Scholar
  25. Karabelias, G. (2009). The military institution, Ataturk’s principles and Turkey’s Sisyphean quest for democracy. Middle Eastern Studies, 45(1).Google Scholar
  26. Karpat, K. (1959). Turkey’s politics: The transition to multiparty system. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kaya, M. K. (2009). The AKP seeking to reinvent Turkey, is forced to tread carefully. Turkey Analyst, 2(21).Google Scholar
  28. Kuru, A. (2006). From Islamism to conservative democracy: The Justice and Development Party in Turkey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriot, Loews, Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Convention Centre, Philadelphia, PA, August 31, 2006.
  29. Lewis, B. (1961). The emergence of modern Turkey. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Murat Ozkaleli, F., & Konuloglu Ozkaleli, U. (2003). The myth and the reality about Turkish Model: Democratization in the Muslim world. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA. Accessed 27 Aug 2007.
  31. Onis, Z. (2004). Turkish modernization and challenges for the new Europe, Perceptions, Autumn.
  32. Ozdalga, E. (1998). The veiling issue, official secularism and popular Islam in modern Turkey. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  33. Penza News. (2013). Turkey’s protests indicate growing independence of civil society, Eurasiareview, News and Analysis, June 15.Google Scholar
  34. Pierini, M. (2013). Urban transformation in Turkey, Carnegie Europe, June 20.Google Scholar
  35. Sirman, N. (1989). Feminism in Turkey: A short history. New Perspectives on Turkey, 13.Google Scholar
  36. Sunar, I., & Toprak, B. (1983). Islam in politics: The case of Turkey. Government and Opposition, 18.Google Scholar
  37. Ustundag, N. (2013). Praise for the marginal groups. Jadaliyya, June 13.Google Scholar
  38. Van Bruinessen, M. (1996). Kurds, Turks and the Alevi revival in Turkey. Middle East Report, July-September 1996.
  39. White, J. B. (2005). The end of Islamism? Turkey’s Muslimhood model. In R. Hefner (Ed.), Modern Muslim politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Yavuz, M. H. (2004). Is there a Turkish Islam? The emergence of convergence and consensus. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 24(2).Google Scholar
  41. Yildiz, A. (2008). Problematizing the intellectual and political vestiges, From ‘welfare’ to ‘justice and development. In U. Cizre (Ed.), Secular and Islamic politics in Turkey, the making of the Justice and Development Party. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Zubaida, S. (2004). Islam and nationalism: Continuities and contradictions. Nations and Nationalism, 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies (MAKAIAS) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian StudiesKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations