Advertisement

Testing and Implementation Process in Automation of a University

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 243)

Abstract

Automation represents one of the major trends of the twentieth century. In many cases, automation has provided the desire benefits and has extended functionality well beyond existing human capabilities. In this era of modern education, automation of higher education institutes is required for the quality education and for the fast administrative work at the institution. Here, we mainly focus on the university. During installation of automation software for any particular department of the university, we have to test it before and during the implementation process. Testing verifies the errors and bugs of the software. Testing effectiveness can be achieved by the use of different testing methods and strategies. Genetic algorithms (GAs) have been successfully applied in the area of software testing. Aim of this paper is to propose GA-based technique to test the software product for the automation of a university.

Keywords

Test process Testing techniques implementation Genetic algorithm (GA) University automation Implementation 

References

  1. 1.
    Hoffman, D.: Test automation architecture: planning for test automation. International Quality Week (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Young, D.: Test automation: an architected approach. Schwab Performance Technologies, Raleigh. www.research.com (2000)
  3. 3.
    Mathur, A.P.: Foundation of software testing, 1st edn. Pearson Education, NJ (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mustafa, K.M., Al-Qutaish, R.E., Muhairat, M.I.: Classification of software testing tools based on the software testing methods. 2nd International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whittaker, J.A.: What is software testing? And why is it so hard? IEEE Softw. 17(1), 70–79 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones, B.F., Sthamer, H.H., Eyres, D.E.: Automatic structural testing using genetic algorithms. Softw. Eng. J. 11(5), 299–306 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitchell, M.: An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srivastava, P.R., Baby, K.: Automated software testing using metaheuristic technique based on an ant colony optimization. Electronic System Design (ISED), International Symposium on 20–22 Dec 2010, pp. 235–240Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Howe, A.E., Von Mayrhauser, A.: Test case generation as an AI planning problem. Autom. Softw. Eng. 4(1), 77–106 (1997). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Manufactured in The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pettichord, B.: Success with test automation. Revised version of a paper originally presented at quality week, San Francisco, May 1996. Version of 28 June 2001Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta, N.K., Rohil, M.K.: Using genetic algorithm for unit testing of object oriented software. IJSSST, 10(3), 1473–8031 (2008). ISSN: 1473-804x onlineGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beizer, B.: Software testing technique, 2nd edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Limited, NJ (1990). (ISBN 0-442-20672-0)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Srivastava, P.R., Kim, T.: Application of genetic algorithm in software testing. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 3(4), 87–96 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vaibhav Sharma
    • 1
  • Jyoti Singh
    • 1
  • A. S. Zadgaonkar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyDr. C. V. Raman UniversityBilaspurIndia

Personalised recommendations