Skip to main content

Analyzing Capacity Development Approaches in CSR Implementation and Their Societal Impact: A Case Study of ITC’s E-Choupal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

This paper examines capacity development for collective action and institutional change through implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives in Indian context. Capacity development for collective action focuses on creating and strengthening capacities that represent the potential for collaborative response to social problems. Framework developed by Rama et al. (2009) has been used to study Collective Action Model (CAM) integrated with capacity development approaches to study CSR implementation and its impact in the context of ITC’s e-chaupal (India). ITC’s e-chaupal has been instrumental in development of individual and organizational capacity, collaborative capacity in enabling environment. This case is pertinent to CSR initiatives in rural development projects. The case shows a good fit to the framework and highlights multi-stakeholder collaborations for an enabling environment and development at grassroots. Framework based analysis is useful, as it enables practitioners and researchers to develop an integrated view of CSR implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A (1993) Community coalitions for health promotion and disease prevention. Health Educ Res 8(3):315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera D, Trochim W (2006) A theory of systems evaluation. In systems evaluation and evaluation system. Whitepaper series. Cornell University Dspace Open Access Repository. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JL (2002) Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. Presented at the social movements and organization theory conference. Ann Arbor, MI. webuser.bus.umich.edu/organizations/smo/2002paper.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaskin RJ (2001) Building community capacity: A definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review 36:291–323

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vita CJ, Fleming C, Twombly EC (2001) Building nonprofit capacity: a framework for addressing the problem. In: De Vita CJ, Fleming C (eds) Building capacity in nonprofit organization. The Urban Institute, pp 5–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Fishman PG, Berkowitz SL, Lounsbury DW, Jacobson S, Allen NA (2001) Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: a review and integrative framework. Am J Community Psychol 29(2):241–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave T, Van de Ven AH (2006) A collective action model of institutional change. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):864–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environ Planning A 30(9):1531–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JE, Booher DE (2003) The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity. Working paper 2003–03. Institute of urban and regional development. University of California, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • ITC (2011) Sustainability in action: e-chaupal. Sustainability report 2011., http://www.itcportal.com/sustainability/sustainability.aspx. Accessed 14 Oct 2011

  • Linnell D (2003) Evaluation of capacity building: lessons from the field. Alliance for nonprofit management. Washington Call Number: 608 LIN

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusthaus C, Adrien M, Perstinger M (1999) Capacity development: definitions, issues, and implications for planning, monitoring and evaluation. Canada. www.universalia.com/files/occas35.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2011

  • McAdam, Doug JD, McCarthy, Mayer NZ (1996) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick R, DiGregario M, McCarthy N (2004) Methods for studying collective action in rural development. Agric Syst 82(3):197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan P (1998) Capacity development and public private partnerships. http://www.gdrc.org/uem/undp-capacity.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2011

  • Poteete A, Ostrom E (2003) In pursuit of comparable concepts and data about collective action. CAPRi working paper 29. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute. http://www.capri.cgiar.org/pdf/capriwp29.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2011

  • Rama D, Milano BJ, Salas S, Liu C (2009) CSR implementation: developing the capacity for collective action. J Bus Ethics 85(Apr):463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith NC (2003a) Corporate social responsibility: not whether but how? Centre for marketing working paper, No. 03–701. London business school, London. http://www.london.edu/marketing. Accessed 14 Oct 2011

  • Smith C (2003b) The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Bus Rev 157–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Thindwa J (2001) Enabling environment for civil society in capacity development projects. World bank, social development family. capacity development Learning Module, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Thindwa J (2003) Enabling environments for civic engagement in PRSP countries. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPCENG/214578116506912206/21061533/sdn82.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2011

  • United Nations Development Program [UNDP] (1997) Capacity development. Technical advisory paper 2. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2006) Capacity development practice note. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells R, Ford EW, McClure JA, Holt ML (2006) Ward a community-based coalitions and capacity for sustainable action: the role of relationships. Health Educ Behav 34(1):124–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Customs Organization (2003) Customs capacity building strategy. www.wcoomd.org/ie/EN/Topics_Issues/topics_issues.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2011

  • Zakocs RC, Guckenburg S (2007) What coalition factors foster community capacity? Lessons learned from the fighting back initiative. Health Educ Behav 34(2):354–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumita Sindhi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annexure: CSR implementation: The Elements of the Framework for Capacity Development

Annexure: CSR implementation: The Elements of the Framework for Capacity Development

Capacity Type

Description

Use in CSR implementation framework (Fig. 3.1)

Enabling environment

Enabling environment capacity refers to the actionable elements of the broader social, economic, political, legal, and cultural environment that can be shaped by collective action

Enabling environment capacity was included as it is a key element in our framework as systemic approaches to capacity development underscore the importance of the enabling environment level as well as the linkages to the other three levels in Fig. 3.1 (Lusthaus et al. 1999)

Collaborative

Terms such as collaborative capacity, network capacity, coalition capacity, and relational capacity have been used in the context of collaborative efforts by multiple stakeholders (Butterfoss et al. 1993; Chaskin 2001; Foster-Fishman et al. 2001; Innes and Booher 2003; Wells et al. 2006; Zakocs and Guckenburg 2007). ‘Collaborative Capacity’ was preferred to coalition capacity because it represents the notion of capacity for collective action by multiple stakeholders. Consistent with prior literature, the authors’ notion of collaborative capacity encompasses organizational (organizational structures, administration, leadership, incentives, communication systems, and continuous learning and evaluation), and relational capacities (shared vision, a cohesive and trusting working climate, and a culture that promotes internal power sharing, inclusiveness and regular interactions among diverse stakeholders of the collaboration (Foster-Fishman et al. 2001)

The term ‘Collaborative Capacity’ refers to the overall capacity of a collaborative effort. It includes both organizational and relational capacities. As shown in Fig. 3.1, collaborative capacity is realized through two types of entities—MSC and MSC networks:

1. MSC capacity (Civil Society Organization—Multi-Stakeholder Coalition) The term MSC refers to the subset of CSO that host the collaborative efforts of multiple stakeholders in order to enact institutional change

2. MSC network capacity: We use this term to refer to specialized networks within a larger collaboration (e.g., The Corporate Council of The Points of Light Foundation)

Organizational

Organizational capacity includes elements such as organizational structures, administration, leadership, incentives, communication systems, and continuous learning and evaluation. Elements of organizational capacity have been examined in several studies. (De Vita et al. 2001; Linnell 2003; UNDP 1997, 2006; World Customs Organization 2003)

As shown in Fig. 3.1, the framework includes (1) external organizational capacity (capacity of CSO that are external to the business organization), and (2) internal organizational capacity (the capacity of the business organization to engage in CSR). External organizations can include organizations that are part of the MSC or others that are impacted by the MSC actions

Individual

Individual capacity refers to individuals’ ability to solve problems, participate in decision-making, and understanding their roles and responsibilities

In the context of the framework, CSR programs can develop capacities in employees as well as those individuals who are engaged in collective action

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sindhi, S., Maurya, U., Shukla, M. (2014). Analyzing Capacity Development Approaches in CSR Implementation and Their Societal Impact: A Case Study of ITC’s E-Choupal. In: Ray, S., Siva Raju, S. (eds) Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1653-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics