Advertisement

Designing a Closed-Loop Logistic Network in Supply Chain by Reducing its Unfriendly Consequences on Environment

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 236)

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between the operations of forward and reverse logistics and the environmental performance measures like \(\mathrm{{CO}}_{2 }\) emission in the network due to transportation activities in closed-loop supply chain network design. A closed-loop structure in the green supply chain logistics and the location selection optimization was proposed in order to integrate the environmental issues into a traditional logistic system. So, we present an integrated and a generalized closed-loop network design, consisting four echelons in forward direction (i.e., suppliers, plants, and distribution centers, first customer zone) and four echelons in backward direction (i.e., collection centers, dismantlers, disposal centers, and second customer zone) for the logistics planning by formulating a cyclic logistics network problem. The model presented is bi objective and captures the trade-offs between various costs inherent in the network and of emission of greenhouse gas CO\(_{2}\). experiments were presented, and the results showed that the proposed model and algorithm were able to support the logistic decisions in a closed loop supply chain efficiently and accurately.

Keywords

Environmental performances Cradle to cradle principle  Closed loop supply chain network Trade off Greenhouse gas 

References

  1. 1.
    Beamon, B.M.: Sustainability and the future of supply chain management. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. 1(1), 4–18 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu, Q.H., Sarkis, J., Lai, K.H.: Green supply chain management implications for “closing the loop”. Transp. Res. Part E 44(1), 1–18 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fleischmann, M., Beullens, P., Bloemhof-ruwaard, J.M., Wassenhove, L.: The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Product. Oper. Manag. 10, 156–173 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, D., Dong, M.: A heuristic approach to logistics network design for end-of-lease computer products recovery. Transp. Res. Part E 44, 455–474 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verstrepen, S., Cruijssen, F., de Brito, M., Dullaert, W.: An exploratory analysis of reverse logistics in Flanders. Eur. J. Trans. Infrastruct. Res. 7(4), 301–316 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pishvaee, M.R., Farahani, R.Z., Dullaert, W.: A memetic algorithm for bi-objective integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. Comput. Oper. Res. 37(6), 1100–1112 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jayaraman, V., Guide Jr, V.D.R., Srivastava, R.: A closed-loop logistics model for remanufacturing. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 50(5), 497–508 (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fleischmann, M., Beullens, P., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M., Wassenhove, L.: The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10(3), 156–173 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salema, M.I., Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P., Novais, A.Q.: A strategic and tactical model for closed-loop supply chains, (pp. 361–386). EURO Winter Institute on Location and Logistics, Estoril (2007a)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    El Saadany, Ahmed M. A., El-Kharbotly, Amin, K.: Reverse logistics modeling. In: 8th International Conference on Production Engineering and Design for Development, Alexandria, Egypt (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Min, H., Ko, C.S., Ko, H.J.: The spatial and temporal consolidation of returned products in a closed-loop supply chain network. Comput. Ind. Eng. 51(2), 309–320 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kannan, G., Sasikumar, P., Devika, K.: A genetic algorithm approach for solving a closed loop supply chain model: a case of battery recycling. Appl. Math. Model. 34(3), 655–670 (2010)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aras, N., Boyaci, T., Verter, V.: Designing the reverse logistics network. In: Ferguson, M.E., Souza, G.C. (eds.), Closed-loop Supply Chains: New Developments to Improve the Sustainability of Business Practices, pp. 67–97. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meixell, M.J., Gargeya, V.B.: Global supply chain design: a literature review and critique. Transp. Res. Part E 41(6), 531–550 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hervani, A.A., Helms, M.M., Sarkis, J.: Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal 12(4), 330–353 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Srivastava, S.K.: Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 9(1), 53–80 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarkis, J.: A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. J. Cleaner Prod. 11(4), 397–409 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sheu, J.B., Chou, Y.H., Hu, C.: An integrated logistic operational model for green supply chain management. Transp. Res. Part E 41(4), 287–313 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krikke, H., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J., Van Wassenhove, L.: Concurrent product and closed-loop supply chain design with an application to refrigerators. Int. J. Prod. Res. 41(16), 3689–3719 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thiriez, H.: OR software LINGO. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 12, 655–656 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Operational ResearchUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of Management ScienceUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations