Sensor Circuits

  • Himanshu K. PatelEmail author
Part of the Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering book series (BIOMEDICAL)


Electronic nose sensors produce signals when they are in contact with the analytes or VOC or gas. These signals can be noisy, of low amplitude, biased, and dependent on secondary parameters such as temperature. Hence it is required to put them into a measurable format for which signal conditioning is required. It is performed using electronic circuitry which may be A/D conversion, filtering, amplification, etc., and it is discussed here. An electronic nose sensor data analysis is non-conventional type data analysis. In this chapter, most frequently used data analysis techniques for electronic nose are discussed.


Sensor Response Notch Filter Electronic Nose Signal Conditioning Wheatstone Bridge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    “Instrumentation engineering handbook”, National nuclear security administration (NEVADA), Dec (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.W. Shin, A hybrid electronic nose system for monitoring the quality of potable water. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warwick, School of Engineering, Oct (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ricardo Gutierrez-Osunae et al., A method for evaluating data-preprocessing techniques for odour classification with an array of gas sensors. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B: Cybern. 29(5), 626–632 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.C. Jurs, G.A. Bakken, H.E. McClelland, Computational methods for the analysis of chemical sensor array data from volatile analytes. Chem. Rev. 100, 2649–2678 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Otto, in Chemo-metrics: statistics and computer application in analytical chemistry, (Wiley-VCH, NY, 1999), pp , pp. 119–174Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.M. Scott, D. James, Z. Ali, Data analysis for electronic nose systems. Microchim. Acta 156, 183–207 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Llobet, E.L. Hines, J.W. Gardner, P.N. Bartlett, T.T. Mottram, Fuzzy ARTMAP based electronic nose data analysis. Sensors and Actuators B 61, 183–190 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.J. Adams, Chemometrics in analytical spectroscopy (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1995), pp. 70–79Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.W. Gardner, P.N. Barlett, Electronic noses: principles and applications, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L.I. Smith, A tutorial on principal components analysis, (2002)
  11. 11.
    J. Roden, D. Trout, B. King, A Tutorial on PCA Interpretation using Comp. Clust (2005)
  12. 12.
    T. Kohonen, Self organized formulation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybermatics 43, 59–69 (1982)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Distante, P. Siciliano, K.C. Persuad, Dynamic cluster recognition with multiple self-organizing maps. Pattern Anal. Appl. 5, 306–315 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Zuppa et al., Drift counteraction with multiple self-organizing maps for an electronic nose. Sens. Actuators B 98, 305–317 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Mooi, M. Sarstedt, A concise guide to market research: the process, data and methods using IBM SPSS Statistics. (Springer, Berlin, 2011), ISBN:- 978-3-642-12540-9.(Chapter 9)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical EngineeringInstitute of Technology, Nirma UniversityAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations