Multimedia Service Delivery on Next-Generation Platforms: A Survey on the Need for Control, Adaptation and Inter-Mediation

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 216)

Abstract

With the increasing popularity of interactive and innovative multimedia streaming applications on mobile devices, the next-generation communication platforms are expected to be ready for such multimedia service delivery. This paper highlights the technical hurdles that arise due to end-user/device mobility and investigates an optimal multimedia service delivery mechanism to deal with mobility-related issues. The proposed solution called the “Mobility and Quality” Service enabler uses media control and mediation to offer cross-layered, application-independent solution to multimedia service delivery. The paper also presents preliminary experiments and results.

Keywords

SIP IMS Multimedia streaming Media control 

References

  1. 1.
    Keshav, S.: Why cell phones will dominate the future internet? SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 35(2), 83–86 (2005). ISSN 0146-4833Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mobile, GSM, global, handset, base station and regional cellular statistics. http://www.cellular.co.za/stats/stats-main.htm. Accessed 08 Aug 2008
  3. 3.
    GPP: evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); Long term evolution (LTE) physical layer; General description. http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/36201.htm (2007). Accessed Dec 2007
  4. 4.
    Iain, E., Richardson, G.: H.264 and MPEG-4 video compression: video coding for next-generation multimedia. Wiley, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petrescu, A., Devarapalli, V., Wakikawa, R., Thubert, P.: Network Mobility (NEMO) basic support protocol. RFC 3963, internet engineering task force. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3963.txt (2005). Accessed Jan 2005
  6. 6.
    Kong, K.-S., et al.: Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6. IEEE Wireless Commun. 15(2), 36–45 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Polidoro, A., Salsano, S., Veltri, L., Ordine, A.: Architecture and testbed implementation of vertical handovers based on SIP session border controllers. Wireless Pers. Commun. 43(3):1019–1034 (2007). ISSN 0929-6212Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kung, H., Chung W.: SIP-based user-oriented handoff control for video phone. Kumamoto, Japan (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Schooler, E.: SIP: session initiation protocol. RFC 3261, internet engineering task force. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt (2002). Accessed June 2002
  10. 10.
    Jacobson, V., Handley, M., Perkins, C.: SDP: Session description protocol. RFC 4566, internet engineering task force. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4566.txt (2006). Accessed July 2006
  11. 11.
    Henrikson, E., Garcia-Martin, M., Mills, D.: Private header (P-Header) extensions to the session initiation protocol (SIP) for the 3rd- Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). RFC 3455, internet engineering task force. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3455.txt (2003). Accessed January 2003
  12. 12.
    Al-Begain, K., Balakrishna, C., Galindo, L.A., Morro, D.: IMS: a development and deployment perspective, Wiley, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kapanga IP soft-phone. http://www.kapanga.net,asseenon08.08.2008 (2008)

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Advanced TechnologyUniversity of GlamorganPontypriddUK

Personalised recommendations