An Automatic MRI Brain Segmentation by Using Adaptive Mean-Shift Clustering Framework

  • J. Bethanney Janney
  • A. Aarthi
  • S. Rajesh Kumar Reddy
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 216)


A novel fully, automatic, adaptive, robust procedure for brain tissue classification from three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance head images (MRI) is described in this paper. We propose an automated scheme for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain segmentation. An adaptive mean-shift methodology is utilized in order to categorize brain voxels into one of three main tissue types: gray matter, white matter, and cerebro spinal fluid. The MRI image space is characterized by a high dimensional feature space that includes multimodal intensity features in addition to spatial features. An adaptive mean-shift algorithm clusters the joint spatial-intensity feature space, thus extracting a representative set of high-density points within the feature space, otherwise known as modes. Tissue segmentation is obtained by a follow-up phase of intensity-based mode clustering into the three tissue categories. By its nonparametric nature, adaptive mean-shift can deal successfully with nonconvex clusters and produce convergence modes that are better applicant for intensity based categorization than the initial voxels. The performance of this brain tissue classification procedure is demonstrated through quantitative and qualitative validation experiments on both simulated MRI data (10 subjects) and real MRI data (43 subjects). The proposed method is validated on 3-D single and multimodal datasets, for both simulated and real MRI data. It is shown to perform well in comparison to other state-of-the-art methods without the use of a preregistered statistical brain atlas.


Adaptive mean-shift Brain magnetic resonance imaging Segmentation 


  1. 1.
    Pham, D.L., Xu, C.Y., Prince, J.L.: A survey of current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 315–337 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rouaïnia, M., Medjram, M.S., Doghmane, N.: Brain MRI segmentation and lesions detection by EM algorithm. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 24 2006Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cocosco, C., Zijdenbos, A., Evans, A.: A fully automatic and robust brain MRI tissue classification method. Med. Image Anal. 7(4), 513–527 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Georgescu, B., Shimshoni, I., Meer, P.: Mean-shift based clustering in high dimensions: a texture classification example. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), France, 2003, pp. 456–463 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derpanis, K.G.: Mean shift clustering. Shape Modeling and Applications, 2005 International Conference, Germany. August 15, 2005 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., Vandeurmeulen, D., Suetens, P.: Auto-mated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18(10), 897–908 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dugas-Phocion, G., González Ballester, M.Á., Malandain, G., Le-brun, C., Ayache, N.: Improved EM-based tissue segmentation and partial volume effect quantification in multi-sequence brain MRI,” in partial volume effect quantification in multi-sequence brain MRI. Paper presented at International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), France, pp. 26–33, 2004 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gudbjartsson, H., Patz, S.: The Rician distribution of noisy MRIdata. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 910–914 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dempster, A., Laird, N., Rubin, D.: Maximum likelihood from in-complete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 39, 1–38 (1977)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., Suetens, P.: A uni-fying framework for partial volume segmentation of brain MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Image. 22(1), 105–119 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Bethanney Janney
    • 1
  • A. Aarthi
    • 1
  • S. Rajesh Kumar Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringSathyabama UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations