Production of the Insurgent Subject

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Political Science book series (BRIEFSPOLITICAL, volume 13)

Abstract

While insurgency in common parlance is attributed to lack of (good) governance, the chapter, contrary to the commonplace belief, traces how insurgency in India’s Northeast has its roots in the very modes and processes through which the region has been sought to be governed from time to time. Being located in the frontier and inhabited mostly by ‘fierce and savage tribes’, the region has always been the source of any governor’s nightmare and has been a sort of laboratory for experimenting with various forms and technologies of governance since colonial times. The early colonial policy—continued even in post-colonial times—of governing the region by profiling the groups and communities in terms of some ‘distinctive’ physical and psychological features, settling them within a relatively enclosed homeland, and subjecting them to an economy of care has often triggered violent competition amongst the political subjects for benefits provided by the state. The initiatives of trumping insurgency and violence by development introduced to the region since the early 1990s tend to create on one hand a subject who has an almost limitless desire for development. On the other hand, these initiatives have also deprived large sections of people of access to critical and life-bearing resources and turned them into a new insurgent collective driven by an acute concern for livelihood and physical survival. India’s Northeast is going to be a new theatre of such biopolitical struggles by these sections of people in the near future.

Keywords

Frontier administration New insurgents Governmentality in India’s Northeast Economy of care Colonial neglect of India’s Northeast Emergence of new citizen Exceptionalism in the Northeast Biopolitical struggle in India’s Northeast 

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (trans: Heller-Roazen, D.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, B. C., Gait, E. A., Howard, H. F., & Allen, C. G. H. (1979). Gazetteer of Bengal and North-East India. New Delhi: Mittal.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L. (1997). Introduction. In S. Endle, The Kacharis (Bodo). Delhi: Low Price Publications (first pub. 1911).Google Scholar
  4. Balibar, E. (2008). Justice and equality: A political dilemma? Pascal, Plato, Marx. Distinguished lecture series. Kolkata: Calcutta Research Group.Google Scholar
  5. Barbora, S. (2011). Assam’s new voice of dissent. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(28), 19.Google Scholar
  6. Baruah, S. (2004). Between South and South East Asia: Northeast India and the look east policy, CENISEAS papers 4. Guwahati: OKD Institute of Social Change and Development.Google Scholar
  7. Baruah, S. (2007). Durable disorder: Understanding the politics of Northeast India. New Delhi: OUP.Google Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya, R. (2011). Development disparities in Northeast India. New Delhi: Foundation Books.Google Scholar
  9. Chakraborty, G. (2010). Encountering globalization in the hill areas of North East India, occasional paper 23. Kolkata: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Chakravorty Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  11. Choudhury, D. P. (1986). Evolution of British tribal policy on the North-East frontier of India (1865–1914). In N. R. Ray (Ed.), Himalaya frontier in historical perspective. Calcutta: Institute of Historical Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, S. P. (1971). The Indian Army – Its contributions to the development of the nation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, S. P. (1988). The military and Indian democracy. In A. Kohli (Ed.), India’s democracy: An analysis of changing state-society relations. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, S. P. (1991). The Indian army: Its contribution to the development of a nation. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Das, G. (2002). Northeastern India soft underbelly: Strategic vulnerability and security. Strategic Analysis, 26(4), 537–549.Google Scholar
  16. Das, G. (2009). Final report of the research project entitled security and development in India’s north east (mimeo). Shillong: Indian Council of Social Science Research, North East Regional Centre.Google Scholar
  17. Das, P. (1980). Assam deserves greater attention. In N. Saikia (Ed.), Assam and the Assamese mind. Jorhat: Asam Sahitya Sabha.Google Scholar
  18. Das, S. K. (2005). ‘The ethnic dimension’ Seminar, Special issue on ‘Gateway to the east: A symposium on Northeast India and the look east policy’, 550, June.Google Scholar
  19. Das, S. K. (2007). Les terroristes du Nord-Est de I’Inde on L’improbable d’un dialogue (in French) [Terrorists in the Northeast and dialogues with them? The improbables in the hypothesis] in NAQD (Paris) (pp. 47–63), Terror/isme: Etats & Societes, Automme/Hiver 2007.Google Scholar
  20. Das, S. K. (2008). Civil society and the language movement of Assam (mimeo).Google Scholar
  21. Das, S. K. (2009). Governing minority rights? The South and South-East Asian scenario. In L. Ghosh (Ed.), Political governance and minority rights: The South and South-East Asian scenario. New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Deka, H. (2006). The Assamese mind: Contours of a landscape. In G. Sen (Ed.), Where the sun rises when shadows fall: The north-east. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Devi, L. (1968). Ahom-tribal relations (a political study). Panbazar: Lawyer’s Book Stall.Google Scholar
  24. Dunbar, G. (1984/1932). Frontiers. New Delhi: Omsons.Google Scholar
  25. Embree, A. T. (1989). Frontiers into boundaries: The evolution of the modern state. In A. T. Embree, Imagining India: Essay on Indian history. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (trans. from the French by Sheridan, L.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1994). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (Essential works of Foucault, 19541984), vol. 1. P. Rabinow (Ed.) (trans: Hurley, R. et al.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Gould, T. (1999). Imperial warriors: Britain and the Gurkhas. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
  30. Gurdon, P. R. (1906/2002). The Khasis. Delhi: Low Price Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Mackenzie, A. (1884/2004). The North East frontier of India. New Delhi: Mittal.Google Scholar
  32. Majumdar, R. C. (Ed.) (1963). The British paramountcy and Indian renaissance, Part I. Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.Google Scholar
  33. Menon, V. P. (1956). Integration of Indian states. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
  34. Ministry of the Development of the North East Region (MDONER). (2005). North East region: Vision 2020 (Vols. 1–2), Government of India.Google Scholar
  35. Miri, M. (2002). Northeast: A point of view (public lecture). www.manipuronline.com/Features/May2002/Northeast14_2. Accessed on 19 Aug 2012.
  36. Muktan, K. K. (2003). Gorkhas’ contribution to external and internal security of India. In A. C. Sinha & T. Subba (Eds.), The Nepalis in Northeast India: A community in search of Indian identity. New Delhi: Indus.Google Scholar
  37. Nag, S. (2002). Structure of a non-state economy: Political economy of terrorism in Northeast India. Contemporary India, 1(4).Google Scholar
  38. Roy, A. & Singh, U. K. (2009). The ambivalence of citizenship: The IMDT Act (1983) and the politics of forclusion in Assam. Critical Asian Studies, 41(1).Google Scholar
  39. Sachdeva, G. (2005). Preparing the Northeastern Economy for the Future. Eastern Quarterly, 3(III), October–December.Google Scholar
  40. Sahni, A. (2001). The terrorist economy in India’s Northeast: Preliminary explorations. Faultlines, 8. http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/publication/faultlines/volume8/Article5.htm. Accessed on 18 Aug 2012.
  41. Sahni, A. & George, T. (2000) Security an development in India’s Northeast: An alternative perspective. Faultlines, 4. http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/publication/faultlines/volume4/Fault4-JG&Asf1.htm. Accessed on 18 Aug 2012.
  42. Samaddar, R. (2010). Emergence of the political subject. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Shakespear, C. L. W. (1929/1980). History of the Assam rifles. Guwahati: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  44. Sharma, P. (1991). A region of neglected potentialities and unrealized opportunities. In N. Saikia (Ed.), Assam and the Assamese mind. Jorhat: Asam Sahitya Sabha.Google Scholar
  45. Singh, N. J. (2002). Colonialism to democracy: A history of Manipur 1819–1972. Guwahati: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  46. Suan, H. K. K. (2011). Rethinking ‘Tribe’ identities: The politics of recognition among the Zo in northeast. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 45(2).Google Scholar
  47. Tarapot, P. (2004). Bleeding Manipur. New Delhi: Har-Anand.Google Scholar
  48. United Committee, Manipur. (2003). The greater autonomy of Manipur: A demand of the people of Manipur. Imphal: UCM.Google Scholar
  49. Verghese, B. G. (2004). Borders matter more than boundaries from the north east looking out. Man and Society: A Journal of North East Studies, 1(1), Spring 2004.Google Scholar
  50. World Bank (2006). Natural resources, water and the environmental nexus for development and growth of Northeast India: Strategy report. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  51. Zachariah, B. (2004). Nehru. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North BengalDarjeelingIndia

Personalised recommendations