Skip to main content

Globalization and Labour Markets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1672 Accesses

Abstract

In recent times, both income inequality and the level of globalisation have been rising rapidly across most parts of the world. The obvious question to ask is: is this pure coincidence or are the two causally related? To answer this question one needs three things: A theoretical argument that links the two observations, a methodology for empirically implementing the theoretical argument and of course reliable data. This chapter is about the ways in which existing research has attempted to implement these steps in order to answer the above question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The discussion below follows the literature in defining income inequality by only looking at a broad feature associated with it: the relative income of high wage earners to low wage earners. In the literature ‘High wage earners’ and “low wage earners’ have often been referred to ‘skilled workers’ and ‘unskilled workers’ or ‘white collar workers’ and ‘blue collar workers’ or even ‘production workers’ and ‘managers’. We will however simply assume that there is a cut off income below which a worker is called ‘low wage’ and above which ‘high wage’. The cut off income is assumed to be equivalently defined in terms of skill. Low skill workers earning low wages and highly skilled workers earning high wages.

  2. 2.

    See Dorfman et al. (1958) Chaps. 2 and 3 and Dixit and Norman (1980) Chap. 2.

  3. 3.

    I am deeply indebted to an anonymous referee for pointing this out to me.

  4. 4.

    Note that with (5.6) (5.1) and (5.2) are no more linear programming exercises.

  5. 5.

    Note that in a small open economy only the sector bias of technology change matters for relative wages as opposed to the factor bias but for outsourcing only factor bias so outsourcing has no effect in a small open economy,.

  6. 6.

    Figure can be drawn by the reader.

  7. 7.

    Research support from the Asian Scholarship Foundation, Bangkok, is gratefully acknowledged. I am indebted to Jong Eun Lee for discussions. I am also deep; y indebted to Se Kwon Joo for research assistance.

  8. 8.

    The Wage Structure Survey reports wages of males, females and total. Throughout this section we have used the figures reported under ‘total’.

References

  • Acharyya R (2006) Trade liberalisation, poverty, and income inequality in India, INRM Policy Brief No. 10 ADB

    Google Scholar 

  • Banga R (2005) Liberalization and wage inequality in India. Working Paper No. 156, Indian Council For Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsini L (2011) Is there really no link between international trade and wage differentials? A cross-country analysis. Discussion Paper no. 118, Collana di E-papers del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche—Università di Pisa

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A, Norman Victor (1980) Theory of international trade: a dual general equilibrium approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman R, Samuelson Paul, Solow A, Robert M (1958) Linear programing and economic analysis. The RAND Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskel J, Slaughter MJ (1999) Trade technology and UK wage inequality. NBER Working Paper No. 6978

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RW (1965) The structure of general equilibrium Models. J Polit Econ 73(6):557–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RW, Schinekman JA (1977) The relevance of the two-sector production model in trade theory. J Polit Econ 85(5):909–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman PR (2000) Technology, trade and factor prices. J Int Econ 50(1 Feb):51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer EE (1996) In search of Stolper Samuelson effects on US wages. NBER Working Paper No. 5427

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra P, Kumar U (2005) Trade liberalization and wage inequality: evidence from India. International Monitary Fund, Working Paper no. WP/05/20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy KV (2008) Wage inequality in Indian manufacturing: is it trade, technology or labour regulations? WP-2008-021. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava A, Mathur SK (2011) Rising wage inequality in India: a translog cost function analysis, J Bus Policy Res 6(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Topel RH (1997) Factor proportions and relative wages: the supply-side determinants of wage inequality. J Econ Perspect 11(2) (Spring, 1997):55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu SC, Trefler D (2011) Trade and inequality in developing countries: a general equilibrium analysis. Michigan State University, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranajoy Bhattacharyya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhattacharyya, R. (2013). Globalization and Labour Markets. In: Banerjee, S., Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Development and Sustainability. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1124-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics