Advertisement

ICoRD'13 pp 1243-1252 | Cite as

Design2go. How, Yes, No?

  • Nikola Vukašinović
  • Jože Duhovnik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

This paper investigates and discusses the opportunities and possibilities of mobile and ubiquitous technologies in the NPD process. During the 2012 EGPR—internationally based NPD process in virtual environment, we made an analysis on technologies and services that were used for the purposes of the course. Our particular interest was, what platforms the students used for different tasks of the NPD process, and are there any mobile alternatives. Since mobile technologies rely more and more on cloud services this opens many other issues as well: intellectual properties rights, protection of personal information, availability of services and information for different participants, standardization of the protocols which should be well considered before any engineering process such as NPD. Our first observations showed that on one side student participants use more and more of different mobile and cloud technologies available, but on the other side there are situations where they still feel much more comfortable when using “old-fashion” technologies, especially when communicating. One interesting fact is also constantly growing wish of students to use the IT web services which they are familiar with despite all necessary IT infrastructure for their work is provided by the course organizers. This is especially important message for the organizers of such courses, to learn how to balance between accepting the opportunities of new internet tools and threats of privacy and control over the intellectual property.

Keywords

Mobile technologies NPD process Internet services Product design Virtual team 

References

  1. 1.
    Fain N, Kline M, Duhovnik J (2011) Integrating R&D and marketing in new product development. J Mech Eng Stroj Vestnik 57(7/8):599–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Žavbi R, Duhovnik J (2007) Experience based on six years of the E-GPR course, international conference on engineering design (ICED07)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vukašinović N et al (2009) Education of NPD in virtual multi-x environments, international conference on research into design, ICoRD’09Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Žavbi R, Tavčar J (2005) Preparing undergraduate students for work in virtual product development teams. Comput Educ 44:357–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fain N, Moes N, Duhovnik J (2010) The role of the user and the society in new product development. Vestnik 56(7/8):521–530Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darrel SFC et al (2012) Bringing employees closer: the effect of proximity on communication when teams function under time pressure. J Prod Innov Manag 29(2):205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Montoya MM et al (2009) Can you hear me now? communication in virtual product development teams. J Prod Innov Manag 26:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leenders RTAJ, van Engelen JML, Kratzer J (2003) Virtuality communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. J Eng Technol Manage 20:69–92Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Durmusoglu SS, Barczak G (2011) The use of information technology tools in new product development phases: Analysis of effects on new product innovativeness, quality, and market performance. Ind Mark Manag 40:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wasiak J et al (2011) Managing by e-mail: what e-mail can do for engineering project management. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 58(3):445–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farris GF et al (2003) Web-enabled innovation in new product development. Res Technol Manag 46(6):24–35Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LECAD Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations