ICoRD'13 pp 1023-1030 | Cite as

A Simple Portable Cable Way for Agricultural Resource Collection

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

A significant problem for Indian farmers today is the difficulty of obtaining labor for farm operations. The most labor intensive operation is the post-harvest resource collection. A simple, economical, compact cable way system has been designed, developed and fabricated to haul sugarcane loads from the field. The cable way is made up of simple collapsible steel ‘A’ posts, which can be assembled on-site from ready-made frames. The sugarcane loads are slung on trolleys which move on a steel cable passing over the top of the frames, the cable being tightened with a chain pulley block. The trolleys are pulled along by a recirculating rope operated by a winch. The empty trolley is pulled along by the same rope along a cable way running near the bottom of the ‘A’ post. Several trolleys can move simultaneously along the cable way. With a 2 HP motor the trolley speed was noticed to be about 0.3 m/s and the overall performance of the prototype was satisfactory. The entire setup is fabricated from easy available and low cost components.

Keywords

Material handling Cable way Rural technology Socially relevant 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the IIT Madras Alumni (Class of ’81) for funding this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Mahesh R (2004) Labour mobility and paradox of rural unemployment—farm labour shortage: a micro level study. Indian J Labour Econ 47(1):25–37Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Majumdar A, Karmakar S, Gupta JP (2004) Status of farm mechanization in Bihar, India. J Interacademicia 4(4):21–30Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharma A (2007) The changing agricultural demography of India: evidences from a rural youth perception survey. Int J Rural Manag 3(1):27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dwyer CF (1975) Aerial tramways, ski lifts, and tows. Forest Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wuschek M (1982) Ropeways-economical and energy-saving. Int Seilbahn Rundschau J 3:118–222Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    State Pollution Control Board (2009) Environmental impact assessment report. Guwahati Ropeway Project, AssamGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neumann ES, Bonasso S, Dede ADI (1985) Modern material ropeway capabilities and characteristics. J Transp Eng 111:651–653Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brockenbrough RL, Merritt FS (1999) Structural steel designers handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIIT MadrasChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Pothu Vivasayee SangamThottakurichiIndia

Personalised recommendations