ICoRD'13 pp 977-988 | Cite as

The Current State of Open Source Hardware: The Need for an Open Source Development Platform

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Open Source Hardware (OSHW) is a new paradigm attempting to emulate the Open Source Software movement. While there are several flagship OSHW projects, this product development paradigm has yet to live up to its full potential. This paper reviews the current state of OSHW and reveals the lack of a robust and simple development platform as being a major barrier to the uptake of OSHW. The authors argue that an Open Source, Cloud-based platform would be the most viable direction.

Keywords

Open source hardware Open source hardware collaboration platform Open source software 

References

  1. 1.
    Koch MD, Tumer IY (2009) Towards open design: the emergent face of engineering—a position paper. In: Proceedings of ICED’09, Vol. 3(11), pp 97–108Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Howard TJ, Achiche S, Özkil A, McAloone TC (2012) Open design and crowd sourcing: maturity, methodology and business models. In: Proceedings of the 12th international design conferenceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fjeldsted AS, Aðalsteinsdóttir G, Howard TJ, McAloone TC (2012) Open source development of tangible products. In: Nord design 2012, Denmark, pp 22–24Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries. Game Changers and Challengers. WileyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fitzgerald B (2006) The transformation of open source software. MIS Q 30(3):587–598Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benkler Y, Nissenbaum H (2006) Commons-based peer production and virtue. J Polit Philos 14(4):394–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ulrich K, Eppinger SD (2007) Product design and development, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manufacturing as a service (MaaS). Postfully yoursGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erixon G (1998) Modular function deployment, a systematic method and procedure for company supportive product modularization. Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steward DV (1981) The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans Eng Manage (3):71–74Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saade RG, Otrakji CA (2007) First impression last a lifetime: effects of interface type on disorientation and cognitive load. Comput Hum Behav 23:525–535Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Alwis B, Sillito J (2009) Why are software project moving from centralized to decentralized version control systems? CHASE’09. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE workshop on cooperative and human aspects on software engineering, IEEE, pp 36–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Engineering Design and Product Development, Department of Mechanical EngineeringTechnical University Denmark (DTU)CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations