Skip to main content

Optimization of the Force Feedback of a Dishwasher Door Putting the Human in the Design Loop

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICoRD'13

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

The aim of the research work described in the paper is to enable designers to optimize the force feedback of a dishwasher door, in order to improve the user experience with the product at the moment of purchase. This is obtained by allowing the user to test the product since the beginning of the design process through the use of interactive Virtual Prototypes based on haptic technologies. A commercially available dishwasher is used as case study. The mechanical system producing the force feedback is modeled in a multi-domain simulation environment, and in parallel a parameterized simplified simulation is made available to the user through a force feedback haptic device. That feedback can be easily modified on user’s requests and the desired behavior can be sent back to the multi-domain simulation, which optimizes the system to behave in the desired way. How to correctly involve humans into the proposed design framework is also discussed, highlighting their key role in determining product characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Norman DA (2003) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neff J (2000) Product scents hide absence of true innovation. Advertising Age 7:22

    Google Scholar 

  3. Spence C, Gallace A (2001) Multisensory design: reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychol Mark 28(3):267–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer C, Schwager A (2007) Understanding customer experience. Harvard Bus Rev 117–126

    Google Scholar 

  5. Veryzer RW (2005) The roles of marketing and industrial design in discontinuous new product development. J Prod Innov Manage 22(1):22–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Otto KN, Wood KL (2001) Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrise F, Bordegoni M, Graziosi S, (2012) A method for designing users’ experience with industrial products based on a multimodal environment and mixed prototypes. Comput-Aided Des Appl (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bordegoni M, Ferrise F, Cugini U (2012) Development of virtual prototypes based on visuo/tactile interaction for the preliminary evaluation of consumer products usage. CIRP Design 2012:149–158

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marquis-Favre W, Bideaux E, Scavarda S (2006) A planar mechanical library in the AMESim simulation software. Part II: library composition and illustrative example. Simul Model Pract Theor 14(2):95–111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Harding JA, Popplewell K, Fung YK, Omar AR (2001) An intelligent information framework relating customer requirements and product characteristics. Comput Ind 44(1):51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Griffin A, Hauser JR (1996) Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. J Prod Innov Manage 13(3):191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leenders M, Wierenga B (2002) The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D. J Prod Innov Manage 19(4):305–317

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michalek JJ, Feinberg FM, Papalambros PY (2005) Linking marketing and engineering product design decisions via analytical target cascading. J Prod Innov Manage 22(1):42–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buchenau M, Fulton J (2000) Experience prototyping symposium on designing interactive systems 2000, ACM Press, Brooklyn, pp 424–433

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zorriassatine F et al (2003) A survey of virtual prototyping techniques for mechanical product development. Proc Instit Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 217(4):513–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hainich RR, Bimber O (2011) Displays: fundamentals and applications. A K Peters/CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hayward V, Astley OR, Cruz-Hernandez M, Grant D, Robles-De-La-Torre G (2004) Haptic interfaces and devices. Sens Rev 24(1):16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bordegoni M, Colombo G, Formentini L (2006) Haptic technologies for the conceptual and validation phases of product design. Comput Graph 30(3):377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim L et al (2008) A haptic dial system for multimodal prototyping. In: 18th international conference on artificial reality and telexistence (ICAT 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sunghwan S et al (2012) Haptic simulation of refrigerator door, Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 2012 IEEE, pp 147–154

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strolz M, Groten R, Peer A, Buss M (2011) Development and evaluation of a device for the haptic rendering of rotatory car doors. Ind Electron IEEE Trans 58(8):3133–3140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Parizet E, Guyader E, Nosulenko V (2008) Analysis of car door closing sound quality. Appl Acoust 69(1):12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van der Auweraer H, Wyckaert K, Hendricx W (1997) From sound quality to the engineering of solutions for NVH problems: case studies. Acta Acustica Unit Acustica 83(5):796–804

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrise F, Bordegoni M, Lizaranzu J, (2010) Product design review application based on a vision-sound- haptic interface. In: Haptic and audio interaction design, vol 6306. Nordahl R, Serafin S, Fontana F, Brewster S (eds) Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 169–178

    Google Scholar 

  25. ISO DIS 9241-210:2008. Ergonomics of human system interaction—part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jain A et al (2010) The complex structure of simple devices: a survey of trajectories and forces that open doors and drawers. In: 2010 3rd IEEE RAS and EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, pp 184–190

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Indesit Company, and in particular Eng. Dino Bongini, for providing the case study and the feedback during the development of the case study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Phillips Furtado, G., Ferrise, F., Graziosi, S., Bordegoni, M. (2013). Optimization of the Force Feedback of a Dishwasher Door Putting the Human in the Design Loop. In: Chakrabarti, A., Prakash, R. (eds) ICoRD'13. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_74

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_74

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, India

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1049-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1050-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics