ICoRD'13 pp 897-911 | Cite as

Analysis of Management and Employee Involvement During the Introduction of Lean Development

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The introduction of Lean Development (LD) requires change efforts within the organisation. People need to be convinced and motivated, development processes are questioned and adapted, eventually structures are changed. This paper compares the LD introduction processes within three SME with respect to three aspects: the top management involvement, the Lean leadership, and the employee involvement. Within those dimensions, main patterns are identified and interpreted to allow the derivation of implications for a successful introduction of LD.

Keywords

Lean development Organisational change Management involvement Employee involvement 

References

  1. 1.
    Womack JP, Jones D, Roos D (1991) The machine that changed the world—the story of lean production. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Womack JP, Jones DT (2003) Lean Thinking. Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oehmen J, Rebentisch E (2010) Waste in product development. In: LAI Paper Series Lean Product Development for Practitioners, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siyam GI, Kirner K, Wynn DC, Lindemann U, Clarkson PJ (2012) Relating value methods to waste types in lean product development. In: Proceedings of International Design Conference—Design 2012, Dubrovnik, 21–24 May 2012Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moran JW, Brightman BK (2001) Leading organizational change. Career Dev Int 6(2):111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Senior B (2002) Organizational change, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Todnem R (2005) Organisational change management: a critical review. J Change Manage 4(5):369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kotter JP (1995) Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. In: Harvard Business Review, Vol 73(2)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emiliani ML, Stec DJ (2005) Leaders lost in transformation. Leadersh Organ Dev J 26(5)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nightingale DJ, Srinivasan J (2011) Beyond the lean revolution: achieving successful and sustainable enterprise transformation. AMACOM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Capgemini Consulting (2010) Change Management Studie 2010: Business Transformation—Veränderungen erfolgreich gestalten, MunichGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Graebsch M, Lindemann U, Weiß S (2007) Lean Development in Deutschland—Eine Studie über Begriffe, Verschwendung und Wirkung. Dr. Hut, MunichGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Helten K, Lindemann U (2012) Structural modelling and analysis of organizational change during lean development implementation. In: Proceedings of International Design Conference—Design 2012, Dubrovnik, 21–24 May 2012Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baskerville RL (1997) Distinguishing action research from participative case studies. J Syst Inf Technol 1(1):24–43Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Susman GI, Evered RD (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm Sci Q 23:582–603Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Product DevelopmentTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations