ICoRD'13 pp 543-555 | Cite as

Inverse Reliability Analysis for Possibility Distribution of Design Variables

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Reliability analysis is one of the major concerns at the design stage since the occurrence of failures in engineering systems may lead to catastrophic consequences. Therefore, the expectation of higher reliability and lower environmental impact has become imperative. Hence the inverse reliability problem arises when one is seeking to determine the unknown design parameters such that prescribed reliability indices are attained. The inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions require the evaluation of the derivatives of the response functions with respect to the random variables. When these functions are implicit functions of the random variables, derivatives of these response functions are not readily available. Moreover in many engineering systems, due to unavailability of sufficient statistical information, some uncertain variables cannot be modelled as random variables. This paper presents a computationally efficient method to estimate the design parameters in the presence of mixed uncertain variables.

Keywords

Fuzzy variables High dimensional model representation Inverse reliability analysis Random variables 

References

  1. 1.
    Li H, Foschi RO (1998) An inverse reliability method and its application. Struct Saf 20:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Der Kiureghian A, Zhang Y, Li CC (1994) Inverse reliability problem. ASCE J Eng Mech 120:1154–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saranyasoontorn K, Manuel L (2004) Efficient models for wind turbine extreme loads using inverse reliability. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 92:789–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng J, Zhang J, Cai CS, Xiao RC (2007) A new approach for solving inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions. Eng Struct 29:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng J, Li QS (2009) Application of the response surface methods to solve inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions. Comput Mech 43:451–459MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Du X, Sudijianto A, Chen W (2004) An integrated framework for optimization under uncertainty using inverse reliability strategy. ASME J Mech Des 126(4):561–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ramu P, Qu X, Youn BD, Choi KK (2006) Inverse reliability measures and reliability-based design optimization. Int J Reliab Saf 1(1, 2):187–205Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee I, Choi KK, Du L, Gorsich D (2008) Inverse analysis method using MPP-based dimension reduction for reliability-based design optimization of nonlinear and multi-dimensional systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:14–27MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rabitz H, Alis OF (1999) General foundations of high dimensional model representations. J Math Chem 25:197–233MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sobol IM (2003) Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79(2):187–193MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rao BN, Chowdhury R (2008) Probabilistic analysis using high dimensional model representation and fast Fourier transform. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 9:342–357MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sakamoto J, Mori Y, Sekioka T (1997) Probability analysis method using fast Fourier transform and its application. Struct Saf 19(1):21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adduri PR, Penmetsa RC (2008) Confidence bounds on component reliability in the presence of mixed uncertain variables. Int J Mech Sci 50:481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Engineering Division, Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations