ICoRD'13 pp 463-475 | Cite as

Relation-Based Posture Modeling for DHMs

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Posture modeling for DHMs has significant effect on their usage in evaluation of product ergonomics. Direct manipulation schemes, such as joint level maneuvering for changing posture, are tedious and need more user intervention; complex scenarios are hardly simulated. This paper presents a high-level, relations based, description scheme for human postures and demonstrations for executing these descriptions using a digital human model (DHM). Here, posture is viewed as a pattern of relations of body segments among themselves and with the environment. These relations are then used as the criteria for the novel description based control. A few basic postures have been derived using the conventional principal planes. The basic postures and the composition rules enable description of complex postures in an easy and unambiguous way. We discussed the issues involved in the execution of descriptions and developed methods to resolve the conflicts due to link fixations. This scheme is effective for both lower and higher level control. Illustrative examples from the implementation of the concepts in our native DHM ‘MayaManav’ are included.

Keywords

Posture control Relations Digital humans Link fixations 

References

  1. 1.
    Chaffin DB (2005) Improving digital human modelling for proactive ergonomics in design. Ergnomics 48(5):478–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Cutkosky MR (1989) On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks. Robot Autom IEEE Trans 5(3):269–279MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sandra JE, Donna JB, Jenna DM (2002) Developmental and functional hand grasps, 1st edn. Slack Incorporated, Thorofare (ISBN-10: 1556425449) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliott JM, Connolly KJ (1984) A classification of manipulative hand movements. Dev Med Child Neurol 26(3):283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iberall T (1997) Human prehension and dexterous robot hands. Int J Robot Res 16(3):285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Badler NI, Phillips CB, Webber BL (1993) Simulating humans: computer graphics, animation, and control. Oxford University Press, OxfordMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ianni JD (1893) A specification for human action representation. In: SAE technical paper series, 1999-01-1893Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hwang BW, Kim S, Lee SW (2006) A full-body gesture database for automatic gesture recognition. In: 7th international conference on automatic face and gesture recognition, pp. 243–248, Apr 2006Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bindiganavale R, Schuler W, Allbeck J, Badler N, Joshi A, Palmer M (2000) Dynamically altering agent behaviors using natural language instructions. In: Autonomous agents 2000, pp 293–300, June 2000Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Badler N, Bindiganavale R, Allbeck J, Schuler W, Zhao L, Palmer M (2000) Parameterized action representation for virtual human agents. In: Cassell J, Sullivan J, Prevost S, Churchill E (eds) Embodied conversational agents, MIT Press, pp 256–284Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norkin CC, White JD (1995) Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry, 2nd edn. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia (ISBN-10: 0803609728)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cailliet R (1992) Soft tissue pain and disability, 2nd edn. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia (ISBN-10: 0803601107)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reddi S, Sen D (2011) A novel scheme for modeling kinematic structures of DHMS with mutable fixations. In: International conference on trends in product life cycle modeling, simulation and synthesisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Product Design and ManufacturingIIScBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations