ICoRD'13 pp 447-462 | Cite as

Study of Postural Variation, Muscle Activity and Preferences of Monitor Placement in VDT Work

  • Rajendra Patsute
  • Swati Pal Biswas
  • Nirdosh Rana
  • Gaur Ray
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Various studies investigated sitting posture while working at VDT for muscle response, posture and preference, to deduce recommendations for design. The posture assumption is a dynamic activity and is often resulted out of continuous visual and physical feedback processed on cognitive level to maintain optimum comfort. The parameters that affect the work station design such as visual display terminal height directly affect the posture and comfort. This paper discusses the study of postural angles such as Head inclination, Trunk bending, Trunk inclination and sEMG muscle activity of Neck Extensors, Erector Spinae, Sternocleidomastoid and Upper Trapezius muscles when a Visual Display Terminal (VDT) user is working at a visual display terminal. The conditions were simulated on a test-rig which was developed on the basis of anthropometric data obtained. The experiment was performed on eight Indian male subjects and the VDT height was varied from 69.5 to 119.5 cm, monitor inclination was varied as 0, 30, 60°. Changes in the sitting postural angles was recorded using photogrammetry, simultaneously sEMG muscle activity of the defined muscles was recorded, also the preferred position of the VDT at each height as responded by the subjects was recorded including preferred VDT height. It was observed that the thoracic bending varied between 120 and 155° which increased with increasing VDT height. The trunk inclination with reference to horizontal varied from 96 to 65°. Similarly neck inclination was observed to change by a span of approximately 40°. The preferred monitor height was observed to be in the range of 89.5–99.5 cm. The Upper Trapezius and Sternocleidomastoid showed variation in muscle activity but not related to monitor height. The Erector Spinae and Neck extensors however responded to the variation in monitor height in exactly opposite pattern. It was observed that the point of intersection of the normalized sEMG ratio curves lies in the span of preferred VDT height responded by the subjects. The potential application of this research is in design of Sit down console, computer work stations/consoles with or without adjustability features in Indian context.

Keywords

VDT height Work station design Sitting posture 

References

  1. 1.
    Straker L, Mekhora K (2000) An evaluation of visual display unit placement by electromyography, posture, discomfort and preference. Ind Ergon 26(2000):389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sommerich CM, Joines SM, Hermans V, Moon SD (2000) Use of surface electromyography to estimate neck and muscle activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 10(2000):377–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Villanueva M, Jonai H, Sotoyama M, Hisanaga N, Takeuchi Y, Saito S (1997) Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the Visual display terminal. Ind Health 35(3):330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamilton N (1996) Source document position as it affects head position and neck muscle extension. Ergonomics 39(4):593–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turville K, Psihogios J, Ulmer T, Mirka G (1998) The effect of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 deg and 40 deg recommendations. Appl Ergon 29(4):239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar S (1994) A computer desk for bifocal lens wearers, with special emphasis on selected telecommunication tasks. Ergonomics 37(10):1669–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aaras A, Fostervold K, Ro O, Thoresen M (1997) Postural work load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures. Ergonomics 40(11):1255–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsio H, Keyserling MW (1991) Evaluating posture behaviour during seated tasks. Ind Ergon 8:313–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeWall M, Reil V, Aghina J, Burdorf A, Snuders C (1992) Improving the sitting posture of CAD/CAM workers by increasing VDU monitor height. Ergonomics 35(4):427–436Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Villanueva M, Sotoyama M, Jonai H, Takeuchi Y, Saito S (1996) Adjustments of posture and viewing parameters of the eye to the changes in screen height of the visual display terminal. Ergonomics 39:933–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burgess-Limerick R, Plooy A, Fraser K, Ankrum DR (1999) The influence of computer monitor height on head and neck posture. Ind Ergon 23:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mandal A (1981) The seated man (Homo Sedens). Appl Ergon 12(1):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fujimaki G, Mitsuya R (2002) Study of the seated posture for VDT work. Displays 23:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ray G, Gupta N, Gupta S (2006) Experimental study to redesign visual display terminal work station for bifocal operators. J Sci Ind Res 65:31–35Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Svensson H, Svensson O (2001) The influence of the viewing angle on neck-load during work with Video display units. J Rehab Med 33:133–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Babski-Reeves K, Stanfield J, Hughes L (2005) Assessment of video display workstation set up on risk factors associated with the development of low back and neck discomfort. Ind Ergon 35:593–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajendra Patsute
    • 1
  • Swati Pal Biswas
    • 1
  • Nirdosh Rana
    • 2
  • Gaur Ray
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Design CentreIndian Institute of technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Theem College of Engineering, BoisarMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations