Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

ICoRD'13 pp 199–210Cite as

Concept Generation Through Morphological and Options Matrices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

The use of morphological analysis as a tool to aid concept generation is examined. Two principal limitations of the method are highlighted; (1) the lack of details generated for system concepts and (2) the explosion of combinatorial possibilities in the use of morphological matrices. The authors propose a method to support the generation of detailed conceptual ideas through functional combinations and use of options matrices, facilitating an intelligent exploration of the design space. In the options matrices, functions that are highly coupled are grouped together and idea generation is performed on the functional combinations based on identified innovation challenges. A subset of highly coupled functions are extracted from the morphological matrices and systematically integrated to form system level concepts. The resulting system concepts have greater design details compared to those generated through traditional morphological analysis techniques, allowing a designer to make informed decisions regarding their feasibility for the design purpose. An example of the proposed method is provided in the design of a seating chassis for automotive applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote KH (2007) Engineering design a systematic approach. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2008) Product design and development. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ullman DG (1997) The mechanical design process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buede DM (2000) The engineering design of systems: models and methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Otto KN, Wood KL (2001) Product design—techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yan W, Chen C-H, Shieh M-D (2006) Product concept generation and selection using sorting technique and fuzzy c-means algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 50(3):273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah JJ (1998) Experimental investigation of progressive idea generation techniques in engineering design. In: Proceedings of DETC98 1998 ASME design engineering technical conference, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zwicky F (1948) Morphological astronomy. Observatory 68:121–143

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ritchey T (2006) Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis. J Operational Res Soc 57(7):792–801

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y, Feng P, He B, Liz Z, Xie Y (2006) Automated conceptual design of mechanisms using improved morphological matrix. J Mech Des 128(3):516–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ölvander J, Lundén B, Gavel H (2009) A computerized optimization framework for the morphological matrix applied to aircraft conceptual design. Comput Aided Des 41(3):187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang GQ, Mak KL (1999) Web-based morphological charts for concept design in collaborative product development. J Intell Manuf 10(3–4):267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tiwari S, Teegavarapu S, Summers J, Fadel G (2007) Automating morphological chart exploration: a multi-objective genetic algorithm to address compatibility and uncertainty. Int J Prod Dev 9:111–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matthews PC (2008) A Bayesian support tool for morphological design. Adv Eng Inform 22(2):236–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin C-C, Luh D-B (2009) A vision oriented approach for innovative product design. Adv Eng Inform 23(2):191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lo C-H, Tseng KC, Chu C-H (2010) One-step QFD based 3D morphological charts for concept generation of product variant design. Exper Syst Appl 37(11):7351–7363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Altshuller G (2005) TRIZ keys to technical innovation. Technical innovation center

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shishko R, Aster R (1995) NASA systems engineering handbook. In: Cassingham R (ed) NASA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bohm MR, Stone RB, Simpson TW, Steva ED (2008) Introduction of a data schema to support a design repository. Comput Aided Des 40(7):801–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fenves SJ (2002) A core product model for representing design information. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 6736

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schotborgh WO (2009) Knowledge engineering for design automation. Ph. d thesis, faculty of engineering technology, University of Twente

    Google Scholar 

  22. Darlington MJ, Culley SJ (2008) Investigating ontology development for engineering design support. Adv Eng Inform 22(1):112–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitamura Y, Kashiwase M, Fuse M, Mizoguchi R (2004) Deployment of an ontological framework of functional design knowledge. Adv Eng Inform 18(2):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by Johnson Controls Incorporated (JCI). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of JCI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, U.S.A

    Dani George, Rahul Renu & Gregory Mocko

Authors
  1. Dani George
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rahul Renu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gregory Mocko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Mocko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Centre for Product Design and Manufactur, Indian Institute of Science, Gulmohar Marg, Bangalore, 560012, Karnataka, India

    Amaresh Chakrabarti

  2. , Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai, 600036, Tamil Nadu, India

    Raghu V. Prakash

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

George, D., Renu, R., Mocko, G. (2013). Concept Generation Through Morphological and Options Matrices. In: Chakrabarti, A., Prakash, R. (eds) ICoRD'13. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, India

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1049-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1050-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation