Advertisement

ICoRD'13 pp 175-186 | Cite as

A Design Inquiry into the Role of Analogy in Form Exploration: An Exploratory Study

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Cross transfer of ideas from one target domain to another with analogies as triggers to generate new ideas is being studied in various fields. But the role of analogy in the creative process for both generating new ideas and exploring high degree of novelty in product form generation needs to be investigated. Using an analogy can help transcend the obvious to the unexpected by forming a confluence of two mediated thoughts, guided by creative interpretations. The important aspect of generating creative ideas is the ability to use the source analogy for a resultant design solution by interpreting it in terms of the design task at hand. The study analyses the creative ideas that emerges from the design solution, specifically focusing on the use of analogy for form exploration. By using the analogical inference, transition from one domain idea to another opens the exploration of novel viewpoints and numerous alternatives. Such a malleable approach of creative generation can yield novel ideas and forms. The paper explores how the use of analogy can facilitate idea generation and allow form exploration. This research examines idea generation issues of creativity by the use of multiple source analogies to help develop multiple domain concepts threw case study method. The study collects empirical data from observations and design outputs during a design session. The aim is to articulate the influencing effect of the use of analogy on factors of form exploration. The goal is to create a value proposition that designers can use to develop novel ideas as well as expressive form generation through radical exploration.

Keywords

Analogy Idea generation Form exploration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I’m grateful to my guide Prof. B K Chakravarthy for his guidance and for allowing me to conduct my experiment within the module, Studies in Form at IDC. The cases cited here are assignments of first semester MDes. students of the 2010 batch. I’m grateful to the students for sharing their work and cooperating with my data collection.

References

  1. 1.
    Boden MA (1994) Dimensions of creativity. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koestler A (1964) The art of creation. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Csikszentmihalyi M (1992) Flow: the psychology of happiness. Rider, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1995) Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christoff K, Keramation K (2006) Abstraction of mental representations: theoretical considerations and neuroscientific evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordon WJJ (1961) Synectics: the development of creative capacity, Harper & Row, Publishers, Incorporated, New York Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hey J, Linsey J, Agogino A, Wood K (2007) Analogies and metaphors in creative design. Proceedings of the mudd design workshop VI, ClaremontGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Bono E (1970) Lateral thinking. Penguin Books, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gero JS (1992) Creativity, emergence and evolution in design In: Gero JS, Sudweeks F (eds) Preprints computational models of creative design, department of architectural and design science, University of Sydney, pp. 1–28 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Csikszentmihalyi M (1997) Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Happer Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glynn S (1991) Exploring science concepts: a teaching with—analogies model. The psychology of learning science. Erlbaum, New JersyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM (1992) Creative cognition: theory, research and application. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howard-Jones PA, Murray S (2003) Ideation productivity, focus of attention, and context. Creativity J 15(2–3):153–166Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cross N (2006) Designerly ways of knowing. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    James M, Scharmann L (2007) Using analogies to improve the teaching performance of preservice teachers. J Res Sci Teaching, 44 (4):565–585 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial Design Centre, IIT BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations