Abstract
Open-X methodologies describe the application of Open Innovation to different stages of the Product-Life-Cycle (PLC). Open Innovation deals with involving external players in a company’s innovation process. Those can provide ideas from any stage of the PLC, such as lead users in the development stage or product-users in the utilization stage. These ideas themselves can initiate innovations in any PLC stage. However, this typically affects the development of new products. This means that ideas collected are incorporated into early PLC stages only. There is significant potential in using ideas not only for early stages but also for later stages, which means for existing products. Open-Utilization, as one form of the Open-X methodologies, can create innovations in the form of upgrades or new services for a product. Because respective PLC stages are not equally suitable for Open-X methodologies, this paper presents an assessment concept for evaluating each PLC stage regarding their Open-X capabilities and possible constraints. To illustrate the utility of the assessment concept, this paper identifies two PLC stages which demonstrate exemplary capacity for Open-X methodologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chesbrough H (2006) Open innovation. Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press
Gassmann O, Enkel E (2004) Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. R&D Management Conference (RADMA), pp 1–18
Howard TJ, Achiche S, Özkil A, McAloone TC (2012) Open design and crowd sourcing: maturity, methodology and business models. International design conference (Design 2012), pp 181–190
Kain A, Kirscher R, Lindemann U (2012) Utilization of outside-in innovation input for product development. International design conference (Design 2012), pp 191–200
Braun A (2012) Open innovation—Einführung in ein Forschungsparadigma. In: Braun A et al. (ed) Open innovation in life science. Springer Link
Haskins C (ed) (2006) INCOSE systems engineering handbook, version 3
Tukker A (2004) Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? experiences from suspronet. Bus Strat Environ 13:246–260
Gassmann O, Enkel E, Chesbrough H (2010) The future of open innovation. R&D Manage 40(3):213–221
Sloane P (2011) A guide to open innovation and crowd sourcing. Kogan Page
Enkel E (2009) Chancen und Risiken von Open Innovation. In: Zerfaß A, Möslein KM (eds) Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktor im Innovationsmanagement. Gabler
Von Hippel E, Franke N, Prügl R (2008) Pyramiding: efficient identification of rare subjects. MIT sloan school of management working paper 4719-08, Oct 2008
OECD/Eurostat (1997) OSLO manual, version 2
Inauen M, Schenker-Wicki A (2012) Fostering radical innovations with open innovation. Eur J Innov Manage 15(2):212–231
Ebner W, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H (2009) Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Manage 39:342–356
Thomke S, von Hippel E (2002) Customers as innovators: a new way to create value. Harvard Business Review
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gürtler, M.R., Kain, A., Lindemann, U. (2013). Bridging the Gap: From Open Innovation to an Open Product-Life-Cycle by Using Open-X Methodologies. In: Chakrabarti, A., Prakash, R. (eds) ICoRD'13. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_106
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_106
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, India
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1049-8
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1050-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)