ICoRD'13 pp 125-135 | Cite as

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Transport Class Aircraft

  • Rahul Ramanna
  • Manoj Kumar
  • K. Sudhakar
  • Kota Harinarayana
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

A 70–80 passenger transport aircraft has been designed using third generation MDO technique. The MDO framework is used to parametrically explore the design space consisting of variables from aerodynamics, structure and control disciplines thereby studying the effects of alternative aerodynamics, structural and material concepts. It employs a panel code for aerodynamic analysis of aircraft and a finite element method for wing level structural optimization and weight estimation. The outputs from these codes are used to perform mission analysis and performance estimation. Stability constraints are implemented by calculating the amount of control power required for static stability and design concepts that do not fulfill the constraints are rejected. This integrated design environment is completely automated. The aircraft is optimized for maximum range using genetic algorithm.

Keywords

MDO Optimization Aircraft Preliminary design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Mr. Abhishek Burman, Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) and Mr. Vikas Munjal, National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL) for their inputs on aerodynamic analysis; Dr. Vijay Patel, ADA and Mr. Mandal, ADE for their valuable inputs on controls; Dr. Pavan, NAL and Dr Shyamsundar, NAL for inputs on structures.

References

  1. 1.
    Raymer DP (1992) Aircraft design: a conceptual approach. AIAA Inc, RestonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kroo I (1997) MDO applications in preliminary design: status and directions. AIAA Paper 97, p 1408Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Willcox K (2008) Advanced multidisciplinary optimization techniques for aircraft design. Bangalore: Indo-US workshop on systems and technologies for regional air transportation, 2008. Indo-US workshop on systems and technologies for regional air transportationGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    AMI Corporation. VSAero User ManualGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pointwise Inc. Pointwise v16 user manualGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Klaus-Jurger Bathe, Cambridge Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Altair Engineering. Hypermesh User ManualGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Altair Engineering (2011) Optistruct user manual. AltairGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kay J et al. (1993) Control authority issues in aircraft conceptual design: critical conditions, estimation methodology, spreadsheet assessment, trim and bibliography. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Federal Aviation Regulation. Part-25 airworthiness standards: transport category airplanes. www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/faa-regulations (Accessed 2012)
  11. 11.
    Vanderplaats (2007) Multidiscipline design optimization, 1st edn. Vanderplaats Research and Development, Inc, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deb K et al. (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm—NSGA-II, vol 2. KanGAL Report Number 2000001, Kanpur, April 2002, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahul Ramanna
    • 1
  • Manoj Kumar
    • 1
  • K. Sudhakar
    • 2
  • Kota Harinarayana
    • 1
  1. 1.Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA)BangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIIT Bombay PowaiMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations