Automated Calibration of Microscope Based on Image Processing Methods

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 222)


Microscopes must be calibrated so that accurate measurements can be made. Pixel size calibration is necessary for medical image processing applications. To calibrate a digital microscope, the normal procedure is to manually measure the distance of the divisions in the image of stage micrometer and find out the pixel size calibration factor. Here we propose an automated methodology for finding pixel size calibration factor of the digital microscope by analyzing the microscopic image of stage micrometer. The proposed methodology can reduce the human observational errors in manual method of calibration. Our approach is scalable and well suited for automated image acquisition applications.


Calibration Digital microscopes Image processing Stage micrometer Segmentation 


  1. 1.
    Altinay D, Bradley AP, Mehnert A (2010) On the estimation of extrinsic and intrinsic parameters of optical microscope calibration. IEEE, digital image computing: techniques and applications, 2010, pp 190–195Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atthi N, Meerot S, Keawpoonsuk A, Jeamsaksiri W, Hruanun C, Poya A (2008) Fabrication of eyepieces lenses scale for optical microscope. IEEE proceedings of ECTI-CON 2008, pp 525–528Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Penzes WB, Allen RA, Cresswell MW, Linholm LW, Teague EC (2000) A new method to measure the distance between graduation lines on graduated scales. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 49(6):1285–1288Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Figl M, Birkfellner W, Hummel J, Ede C, Hanel R, Bergmann H (2003) Calibration of an optical see through head mounted display with variable zoom and focus for applications in computer assisted interventions. In: Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2003: visualization, image-guided procedures, and display, vol 5029, pp 618–623Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gonzalez R, Woods R (1992) Digital image processing. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ammi M, Fremont V, Ferreira A (2009) Automatic camera based microscope calibration for a telemicro manipulation system using a virtual pattern. IEEE Trans Robot 25(1):184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ralis SJ, Vikramaditya B, Nelson BJ (2000) Micropositioning of a weakly calibrated microassembly system using coarse-to-fine visual serving strategies. IEEE Trans Electron Packag Manuf 23(2):123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boddeke FR, Van Vliet LJ, Young IT (1997) Calibartion of the automated z-axis of a microscope using focus functions. J Microsc 186(Pt 3):270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chavez G, Valera B, Padilla S (2004) Automated calibration of graduated scales. 1st international conference on electrical and electronics engineering, pp 385–390Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rajesh Kumar R, Ajith Kumar V, Sharath Kumar PN, Sudhamony S, Ravindrakumar R (2011) Detection and removal of artifacts in cervical cytology images using support vector machine. In: Proceedings of IEEE symposium on IT in medicine and education (ITME), Dec 2011, pp 717–721, doi:  10.1109/ITiME.2011.6130760
  11. 11.
    Theuwissen AJP (2001) CCD or CMOS image sensors for consumer digital still photography? IEEE, VLSI technology, systems, and applications, 2001, pp 168–171Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Development of Advanced ComputingTrivandrumIndia

Personalised recommendations