Contrast Improvement of Mammographic Masses Using Adaptive Volterra Filter

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 222)

Abstract

Due to ill-performance of X-ray hardware systems, mammographic images are generally noisy with poor radiographic resolution. This leads to improper visualization of lesion details. This paper presents an improved Volterra filter design known as Adaptive Volterra filter for contrast enhancement of mammograms. The operation of the adaptive filter proposed in this work can be classified as Type-0, Type-1 and Type-2 depending upon the nature of background tissues (fatty, fatty-glandular or dense) in the mammogram. This filter is considered as a Taylor series with memory whose truncation to the first non-linear term may lead to a simpler and effective representation. Computer simulations are performed on digital mammograms from MIAS database yielding promising improvement in contrast of the targeted lesion along with reasonable suppression of background in comparison to other enhancement techniques.

Keywords

Breast cancer Contrast improvement index MIAS database Quadratic filter Volterra filter 

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures (2012). http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/commoncancers
  2. 2.
    Lojacono R et al (2008) Mammographic images enhancement and denoising for breast cancer detection using dyadic wavelet processing. IEEE Trans Instrumen Meas 57(7):1422–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang H, Zhuang T, Wu Ed X (2001) Realization of fast 2-D/3-D image filtering and enhancement. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(2):132–140Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jusman Y, Mat Isa NA (2010) A proposed system for edge mammogram image. In: Proceedings of the of the 9th world scientific and engineering academy and society (WSEAS) international conference on applications of electrical engineering, pp 117–123Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang C, Laine A (1999) Coherence of multiscale features for enhancement of digital mammogram. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 3(5):32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yan Z et al (2001) An approximation-weighted detail contrast enhancement filter for lesion detection on mammograms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol 3, pp 2472–2475Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zheng J, Fuentes O, Leung M (2010) Super resolution of mammograms. In: IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in bioinformatics and computational biology (CIBCB), Montreal, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Kindi SG, Al-Kindi GA (2011) Breast sonogram and mammogram enhancement using hybrid and repetitive smoothing-sharpening technique. In: Proceedings of the 1st middle east conference on biomedical engineering (MECBME), Sharjah, pp 446–449Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mathews VJ, Sicuranza GL (1993) Volterra and general volterra related filtering. In: IEEE winter workshop on nonlinear digital signal processing, pp T_2.1–T_2.8Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salmond DJ et al (1993) Novel approach to non-linear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE on radar and signal processing, vol 140, pp 107–113Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pitas I, Venetsanopoulos AN (1992) Order statistics in digital image processing. Proc IEEE 80(12):1893–1921Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stevenson R, Arce G (1987) Morphological filters: statistics and further syntactic properties. IEEE Trans Circ Syst 34(11):1292–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mathews VJ (1991) Adaptive polynomial filter. IEEE Signal Process Mag 8(3):10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sicuranza GL (1992) Quadratic filters for signal processing. In: Proc IEEE 80(8):1263–1285Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sicuranza GL (2000) Volterra filters for image and video processing. In: Proceedings of the first international workshop on image and signal processing and analysis, Pula, pp 15–26Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suckling J et al (1994) The mammographic image analysis society mammogram database. In: Proceedings of 2nd international workshop on digital mammography, York, UK, pp 375–378Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morrow WM et al (1992) Region based contrast enhancement of mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 11:392–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogowska J, Preston K, Shasin D (2009) Evaluation of digital unsharp masking and local contrast stretching as applied to chest radiology. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed Eng 35(2):236–251Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pisano ED et al (1998) Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. J Digit Imaging 11:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramponi G (1990) Bi-Impulse response design of isotropic quadratic filters. Proc IEEE 78(4):665–667Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou Y et al (2009) Mammogram enhancement using alpha weighted quadratic filter. In: Proceedings of annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp 3681–3684Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashutosh Pandey
    • 1
  • Anurag Yadav
    • 1
  • Vikrant Bhateja
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringShri Ramswaroop Memorial Group of Professional CollegesLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations