Experimental Verification of Squirrel Cage Induction Motor Using Current Signature and Virtual Instrumentation Topology

  • K. Vinoth  Kumar
  • S. Suresh Kumar
  • S. Daison Stallon
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 222)

Abstract

Three phase squirrel cage induction motors are workhorses of industry and are the widely used industrial drives. With the passage of time the machine may develop faults and may hamper the production line that may lead to production and financial losses. A proper planning of maintenance schedule and condition monitoring is essential to reduce such financial loss and shut down time. A condition monitoring system, which can predict and identify the prefault condition, is the need of the age to prevent such unwanted breakdown time. The MCSA (Motor Current Signature Analysis) technique is found one of the most frequently used technique to identify the prefault condition. This paper focuses on experimental results to prove that MCSA Technique can identify the good and cracked rotor bar in three phase squirrel cage induction motors under no-load and different load conditions and also simulated in Virtual Instrumentation. The diagnostics strategy is presented in this paper and variables that influence the diagnosis are discussed.

Keywords

Induction motor Virtual instrumentation Broken bars 

References

  1. 1.
    Thomson WT (1999) A review of on-line condition monitoring techniques for three-phase squirrel cage induction motors. The Robert Gorden University, Scotland, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhongming YE, Bin WU (2000) A review on induction motor online fault diagnosis. Ryerson Polytechnic University, Canada, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saravana Kumar R, Ray KK, Swaminathan G (2004) Fuzzy logic based fault identification system for a three phase induction motor. In: Proceedings of the 28th NSC-2004 on 16–18Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomson WT (2001) On-line MCSA to diagnose shorted turns in low voltage stator windings of 3-phase induction motors prior to failure, IEEE, PES&IAS IEMDC. MIT, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomson WT, Fenger M (2001) Current signature analysis to detect induction motor faults. IEEE Trans IAS Mag 7(4):26–34Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bishop T (2003) Squirrel cage rotor testing. EASA Convention 2003, Moscone convention Centre, San Francisco, CA, June 30Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tavner P, Penman J (2011) Condition monitoring of electrical machines, Research Studies Ltd. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vas P (1995) Parameter estimation, condition monitoring & diagnosis of electrical machines. Peter vas, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Vinoth  Kumar
    • 1
  • S. Suresh Kumar
    • 2
  • S. Daison Stallon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringSchool of Electrical Sciences, Karunya UniversityCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringDr.N.G.P.Institute of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations