Advertisement

Multi-Resolution 3D Human Brain Visualization Through Streaming

  • V. Vani
  • R. Pradeep Kumar
  • S. Mohan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 221)

Abstract

The well established techniques for video and audio streaming have become the primary inspiration to focus our research towards 3D Streaming. In 3D streaming, the model is buffered and rendered instead of complete download. The central idea of this paper is to visualize the typical 3D human brain model at different resolutions based on the client’s requirement at a rapid rate with necessary interactions. This is achieved by initially streaming the simplified version of 3D human brain and then the refinements are streamed based on the client’s requirement. The experiment results and analysis affirms the fact that this type of multi resolution streaming reduces the initial time to present the rendered 3D model to the requested clients. Experiments are further conducted to compare the quality of the multi resolution models that are being rendered with respect to the original model.

Keywords

Multi-resolution model 3D streaming 3D rendering 3D visualization 

References

  1. 1.
    Brutzman D, Macedonia M, Rhyne T-M, McCanne S (1997) Internetworked 3D computer graphics: beyond the bottlenecks and roadblocks. ACM SIGCOMM ‘97Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blanc AL, Bunt J, Petch J, Kwok Y (2005) The virtual learning space: an interactive 3D environment. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on 3D web technology (Bangor, United Kingdom). Web3D ‘05. ACM, New York, pp 93–102. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1050491.1050505, 29 March–01 April 2005
  3. 3.
    Deb S, Narayanan PJ (2004) Design of a geometry streaming system. In: Proceedings of ICVGIP, pp 296–301Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen JD, Luebke D, Duca N, Schubert B, Niski C (2004) GLOD: a minimal interface for geometric level of detail, p 10. Johns Hopkins University Graphics Lab Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoppe H (1996) Progressive meshes. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH ‘96). ACM, NY, USA, pp 99–108. doi: 10.1145/237170.237216
  6. 6.
    Shaffer E, Garland M (2005) A multi-resolution representation for massive meshes. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 11(2)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen JD, Manocha D (2005) Model simplification for interactive visualization. In: Johnson C, Hansen C (eds) Visualization handbook, p 13, Chapter 20. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, pp 393–410Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma H, Huang T, Wang Y (2010) Multi-resolution recognition of 3D objects based on visual resolution limits. Pattern Recognit Lett 31(3):259–266. ISSN 0167-8655.  10.1016/j.patrec.2009.08.015
  9. 9.
    Xin L (2011) Research on LOD technology in virtual reality. Energy Procedia 13:5144–5149. ISSN 1876-6102.  10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.142
  10. 10.
    Erikson C, Manocha D, Baxter WV III (2001) HLODs for faster display of large static and dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of the symposium on interactive 3D graphics (I3D ‘01). ACM, NY, USA, pp 111–120. doi: 10.1145/364338.364376
  11. 11.
    Charalambos JP (2010) Hoq-driven HLOD refinement: using hardware occlusion queries information to drive hierarchical level-of-detail refinement. VDM, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aspert N, Santa-Cruz D, Ebrahimi T (2002) MESH : measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference in multimedia and expo (ICME), vol 1, pp 705–708, Lausanne, Switzerland, 26–29 Aug 2002Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bulbul A, Capin T, Lavoué G, Preda M (2011) Assessing visual quality of 3D polygonal models. IEEE Signal Process Mag 28(6):80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cignoni P, Montani C, Scopigno R (1998) A comparison of mesh simplification algorithms. Comput Graph 22(1):37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cignoni P, Rocchini C, Scopigno R (1998) Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. Comput Graph Forum 17(2):167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyDr. N. G. P. IT, Affiliated to Anna UniversityCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science EngineeringAdithya IT, Affiliated to Anna UniversityCoimbatoreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science EngineeringDr. N. G. P. IT, Affiliated to Anna UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations