Advertisement

A Comparative Analysis of Image Fusion Methods Using Texture

  • Jharna Majumdar
  • Bhuvaneshwari S. Patil
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 221)

Abstract

Image fusion produces a single image from a set of input images such that the fused image have more complete information useful for human or machine perception. In the proposed paper, authors have used feature based image fusion, where textures of the image are used as feature. Image Texture is a process that can be applied to the pixel of an image in order to generate a measure (feature) related to the texture pattern, to which that pixel and its neighbors belong. Authors have used five different texture feature extraction methods for fusion of multi sensor, multi focal, multi temporal and multi spectral imagery. The methods are: GLCM, Runlength, Statistical, Tamura and Texture Spectrum. The performance of fusion algorithm is measured using a number of nonreference quality assessments metric. A meaningful comparison of results and analysis show the suitability of various texture features for fusion of images from multiple modalities.

Keywords

GLCM Runlength Statistical Tamura and texture spectrum Image fusion Quality parameters 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge VTU Research Fund, VTU Belgaum for sponsoring the Project at the Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Bangalore. The authors gratefully acknowledge Venkatesh G M, Research Associate of NMIT for his contribution during the course of this work. The authors acknowledge the constant support and encouragement provided by Dr. N.R. Shetty, Director NMIT and Dr. H C Nagaraj, Principal NMIT during the course of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Sadjadi F (2005) Comparative image fusion analysis. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR’05, 2005Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang Z, Ziou D, Armenakis C, Li D, Li Q (2005) A comparative analysis of image fusion methods. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43(6):1391–1402Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu Z, Blasch E, Xue Z, Zhao J, Laganiere R, Wu W (2012) Objective assessment of multiresolution image fusion algorithms for context enhancement in night vision: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(1):94–109Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jian Yang Jingfeng Guo (2011) Image texture feature extraction method based on regional average binary gray level difference co-occurrence matrix. IEEE Int Conf Virtual Reality Vis 10(3):61–64 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gui Y, Chen M, Ma L, Chen Z (2011) Texel based regular and near-regular texture characterization. In: International conference on multimedia and signal processing (CMSP-2011), IEEE, 14–15 May 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mumtaz A, Majid A, Mumtaz A (2008) Genetic algorithms and its application to image fusion. In: 2008 international conference on emerging technologies, IEEE-ICET, 18–19 October 2008Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheng Z, Wen-Zhong S, Liu J, Zhu G-X, Tian J-W (2007) Multisource image fusion method using support value transform. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(17):1831–1839Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alam FI, Faruqui RU (2011) Optimized calculation of Haralick texture features. Eur J Sci Res IISN 1450-216X 50(4) 543–553Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhiwani RJ, Khan MA, Agarwal SM (2010) Texture based pattern classification. Int J Comput Appl (0975-8887) 1(1):54Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borghys D et al (1997) Long range target detection in a cluttered environment using multi-sensor image sequences. In: Proceedings on signal processing, sensor fusion and target recognition IV—SPIE—USA (Orlando), 20–25 April 1997Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yi L, Yingle F, Jian X (2007) A new method based on fused features and fusion of multiple classifiers applied to texture segmentation. Ind Electron Appl, CIEA 2007Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haralick RM et al (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3(6):610–621Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lohmann G (1995) Analysis and synthesis of textures: a co-occurrence-based approach. CVGIP 19(1):29–36Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Verlinde P et al (1997) Data fusion for a long range target acquisition. In: Seventh symposium on multi sensor systems and data fusion for telecommunications, Agard, NATO, 1997Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Galloway MM (1975) Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. CVGIP 4:172–179Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen YQ, Mark SN, David WT (1995) Statistical geometrical features for texture classification. Pattern Recogn 28(4):537–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tamura H et al (1978) Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-8(6)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    He D-C, Wang L (1990) Texture unit, texture spectrum, and texture analysis. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28(4):509–512Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    He D-C, Wang L (1990) Texture features based on texture spectrum. Pattern Recognit 24:905–910 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang Z, Bovik AC (2002) A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Process Lett 9(3):81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Piella G 2004 New quality measures for image fusion. In: Proceedings of international conference on information fusion, Sweden. 28 June–1 July 2004Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cvejic N, Seppänen T, Godsill SJ (2009) A nonreference image fusion metric based on the regional importance measure. IEEE J Sel Top Sign Proces 3(2):212–221Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CSE(PG)Nitte Institute of TechnologyBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of CSE(PG)Nitte Institute of TechnologyBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations