Improvising the Ad hoc on Demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol When Nodes or Links Fails

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Bioengineering book series (LNBE)

Abstract

Networks are being used in various areas and the demand of users’ nowadays has motivated the emergence of the mobile ad-hoc network (MANET). MANET is a dynamic network without the fixed infrastructure due to their wireless nature and topology and changes due to their dynamic nature. Among various protocol used as routing protocol in the MANET the ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) is most popular and widely used due to their various beneficial characteristics. But its beneficial characteristics will degrade when nodes or links fail as it sends the error message back to the source and whole process is repeated again. In this chapter, we proposes an method to carry forward the data packet when nodes or links fail from the last node it receives. This chapter will really improve the factors likes throughput, reliability, security, packet size, overheads, traffic congestion.

Keywords

Reactive Proactive Hybrid protocol Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing Mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) Take another best route (TABR) Acknowledgment to intermediate nodes (ACKI) Acknowledgment to source nodes (ACKS) Source (S) Destination (d) 

References

  1. 1.
    Perkins C (2001) Ad-hoc networking. Addison-Wesley, BostanGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou Z (2007) Security enhancement over ad-hoc AODV routing protocol, Tsinghua University, Beijing, zhou-zw02@mails.tsinghua.edu.cnGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aalam SS, Victorie TAA (2011) Node prediction—routing in mobile ad hoc networks © EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. http://www.europeanjournalofscientificresearch.com
  4. 4.
    Shastri A, Khatri P, Jain S (2010) Performance analysis of ad-hoc network under node failure. IJCTEE_0910 _32.pdf, vol 1(2)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perkins CE, Royer EM (1999) ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In: Proceedings of 2nd IEEE workshop mobile computing systems and applications (WMCSA’99), pp 90–100Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuppuchamy NK, Manimegalai R (2012) A comprehensive survey of AODV routing protocol in MANET” © 2012 JCSE www.journalcse.co.uk
  7. 7.
    Zangeneh V, Mohammadi S (2006) New multipath node-disjoint routing based on AODV protocol, v76-116.pdfGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ismail Z, Hassan R (2011) Effects of packet size on AODV routing protocol implementation in homogeneous and heterogeneous MANET © 2011 IEEE doi: 10.1109/CIMSim.2011.70
  9. 9.
    Aalam SS, Victorie TAA (2011) Node prediction—routing in mobile ad hoc networks © Euro Journals Publishing, Inc. 2011 http://www.europeanjournalofscientificresearch.com
  10. 10.
    Jyoti J, Roopam G, Bandhopadhyay TK (2011) On demand local link repair algorithm for AODV protocol. Int J Comput Appl 35(5):20–25. (ISSN:09758887)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marandin D (2008) Performance evaluation of failed link detection in mobile ad hoc networks marandin@ifn.et.tu-dresden.deGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brijesh Soni
    • 1
  • Biplab Kumar Sarkar
    • 2
  • Arjun Rajput
    • 1
  1. 1.CSE DepartmentT.I.TBhopalIndia
  2. 2.CSE DepartmentT.I.T (Excellence)BhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations