Biomechanical Analysis of the RP Model of Human Humerus Bone and its Comparison with the Real Proximal Humeral Bone

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Bioengineering book series (LNBE)


The goal of this study is to biomechanically evaluate the rapid prototype (RP) model of the human humeral bone and to compare it with the real proximal humeral bone under the similar loading and boundary conditions. Composite bones provide a reliable source of consistent geometry for finite element (FE) models, as they allow for repeatable experimental validation of the FE model, and avoid handling and preservation issues associated with post-mortem specimens. The altered model of the bone can be considered as patient-specific bone geometry and the loading and boundary conditions are applied accordingly.


Biomechanically Finite element Proximal humeral bone Rapid prototype 



The authors thank the Additional Director, Dr. Chandra Sekhar (Scientist ‘G’), R. Anbazhagan (Scientist ‘D’), G.T.R.E, R&D, DRDO, Bangalore, who helped us for the creation of the RP model and Dr. Pushpraj Bhatele for providing the medical imaging data. We also thank Dr. (Mrs.) Shobha Katheria, Principal Medical Officer, Ordnance Factory Hospital, Itarsi, M.P. India, for a back support, making us aware of the doctoral issues and practices. We are also thankful to all the faculty members of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government Engineering College, Jabalpur, M.P, India.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors disclose that they have no financial or personal relationships with organisations or people that could inappropriately influence this work.


  1. 1.
    Houston RL (2009) Principles of biomechanics. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, ISBN 13:978-0-8493-3494-8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Kinesiology of the Upper Extremity” Part II, Unit 2, Oatis_CH08-117-149.qxd 4/18/07 2:29 PM, pp 117–121Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brennan J (2010–2011) Production of anatomical models from CT scan data. Masters Dissertation, De Montfort University, Leicester, 2010–2011Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Materialise Interactive Medical Image Control System (MIMICS) 10.01: User GuideGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Truscott M, Prof. de Beer DJ, Booysen GJ, Barnard LJ (2004) Bone development through CT/CAD/CAM/RP. Central University of Technology, BloemfonteinGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chandramohan D, Dr Marimuthu K (2011) Humerus bone development through CT/CAD/RPT. Int J Eng Res Appl 1(4):1256–1261. ISSN: 2248-9622Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chandramohan D, Marimuthu K (2011) Natural fiber bone plates as substitutes for orthopaedic alloy plates. Biotechnol Bioinf Bioeng 1(4):405–413. ISSN 2249-9075 (Society for applied biotechnology)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oka K, Murase T, Moritomo H, Goto A, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H (2009) Accuracy analysis of three-dimensional bone surface models of the forearm constructed from multidetector computed tomography data. Int J Med Rob Comp Assist Surg 5:452–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Government Engineering CollegeJabarlpurIndia
  2. 2.Hitkarni College of Engineering and TechnologyJabalpurIndia
  3. 3.Government Engineering CollegeJabalpurIndia

Personalised recommendations