Catheter-Based 24-h pH-Metry and Impedance: Technique, Interpretation, and Clinical Application

  • Uday C. GhoshalEmail author
  • Rajan Singh


Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition in gastroenterology practice. Classical techniques like endoscopy and 24-h pH-metry are often used to diagnose patients with symptoms related to GERD. Although these techniques have been useful over the years both for diagnosis and therapeutic guidance, there are still many patients with typical or atypical GERD symptoms with normal endoscopy and pH-metry who do not respond adequately to anti-secretory therapy. 24-h impedance combined with pH is a new technique and currently considered as the gold standard for diagnosis of GERD. It offers greater sensitivity for the detection of all reflux episodes, and allows us to establish their nature (liquid, gas, mixed), composition (acidic, non-acidic), and clearance. This chapter describes basic principles, technique, interpretation, and clinical application of 24-h pH impedance monitoring.


Esophageal pH monitoring Gastroesophageal reflux Electrical impedance pH-metry Atypical symptoms 


  1. 1.
    Nguyen HN, Domingues GR, Lammert F. Technological insights: combined impedance manometry for esophageal motility testing-current results and further implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6266–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fass J, Silny J, Braun J, Heindrichs U, Dreuw B, Schumpelick V, et al. Measuring esophageal motility with a new intraluminal impedance device. First clinical results in reflux patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;29:693–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dolder M, Tutuian R. Laboratory based investigations for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24:787–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho YK. How to interpret esophageal impedance pH monitoring. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;16:327–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tutuian R, Castell DO. Review article: complete gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring – combined pH and impedance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24 Suppl 2:27–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sifrim D, Fornari F. Esophageal impedance-pH monitoring. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:161–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bredenoord AJ. Impedance-pH monitoring: new standard for measuring gastro-oesophageal reflux. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:434–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J, Tack J, Lerut A, Janssens J. Composition of the postprandial refluxate in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:647–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Villa N, Vela MF. Impedance-pH testing. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42:17–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J, Xin Z, Tack J, Lerut A, et al. Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1588–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghoshal UC, Singh R, Misra A. Esophageal function tests in clinical practice: a review. Trop Gastroenterol. 2010;31:145–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang A, Pleskow DK, Banerjee S, Barth BA, Bhat YM, Desilets DJ, et al. Esophageal function testing. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:231–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, Vela M, Wise J, Balaji N, et al. Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1037–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zentilin P, Iiritano E, Dulbecco P, Bilardi C, Savarino E, De Conca S, et al. Normal values of 24-h ambulatory intraluminal impedance combined with pH-metry in subjects eating a Mediterranean diet. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38:226–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zerbib F, des Varannes SB, Roman S, Pouderoux P, Artigue F, Chaput U, et al. Normal values and day-to-day variability of 24-h ambulatory oesophageal impedance-pH monitoring in a Belgian-French cohort of healthy subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:1011–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, Tutuian R, Katz PO, Castell DO. Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1599–606.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tutuian R, Castell DO. Reflux monitoring: role of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005;15:361–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Galmiche JP. Impedance-pH monitoring in proton pump inhibitor resistant patients: ready for clinical application? Gut. 2006;55:1379–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hirano I, Richter JE. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:668–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vela MF. Non-acid reflux: detection by multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH, clinical significance and management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:277–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Conchillo JM, Smout AJ. Addition of esophageal impedance monitoring to pH monitoring increases the yield of symptom association analysis in patients off PPI therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:453–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Savarino E, Zentilin P, Tutuian R, Pohl D, Casa DD, Frazzoni MC, et al. The role of nonacid reflux in NERD: lessons learned from impedance-pH monitoring in 150 patients off therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2685–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Curvers WL, Timmer R, Smout AJ. Determinants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation. Gut. 2006;55:313–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tutuian R, Vela MF, Hill EG, Mainie I, Agrawal A, Castell DO. Characteristics of symptomatic reflux episodes on Acid suppressive therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1090–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mainie I, Tutuian R, Shay S, Vela M, Zhang X, Sifrim D, et al. Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring. Gut. 2006;55:1398–402.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tutuian R, Mainie I, Agrawal A, Adams D, Castell DO. Nonacid reflux in patients with chronic cough on acid-suppressive therapy. Chest. 2006;130:386–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bajbouj M, Becker V, Neuber M, Schmid RM, Meining A. Combined pH-metry/impedance monitoring increases the diagnostic yield in patients with atypical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Digestion. 2007;76:223–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blondeau K, Tack J. Pro: impedance testing is useful in the management of GERD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2664–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zerbib F, Roman S, Ropert A, des Varannes SB, Pouderoux P, Chaput U, et al. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1956–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sifrim D, Dupont L, Blondeau K, Zhang X, Tack J, Janssens J. Weakly acidic reflux in patients with chronic unexplained cough during 24 hour pressure, pH, and impedance monitoring. Gut. 2005;54:449–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Blondeau K, Dupont LJ, Mertens V, Tack J, Sifrim D. Improved diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with unexplained chronic cough. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:723–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologySanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical SciencesLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations