Advertisement

High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry: Principles, Technique, and Interpretation

  • Abhai Verma
  • Asha Misra
  • Uday C. GhoshalEmail author
Chapter
  • 806 Downloads

Abstract

There are many upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) disorders in which either the cause or the result is abnormal motility. Naturally, the study of motor functions of the gut in normal and abnormal conditions is of great help in understanding the pathophysiology and management of these disorders. Motor functions of the GI tract can be assessed by a variety of recording techniques including radiology, scintigraphy, manometry, and most recently intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring. In many instances the techniques are complementary to each other. However, manometry is the most reliable and reproducible method of studying motor functions of the esophagus. In this chapter we will elaborate principles, technique, and interpretation of esophageal manometry.

Keywords

Esophagus Dysphagia Motor disorders Achalasia Diagnosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Dodds WJ, Stef JJ, Hogan WJ. Factors determining pressure measurement accuracy by intraluminal esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 1976;70(1):117–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arndorfer RC, Stef JJ, Dodds WJ, Linehan JH, Hogan WJ. Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 1977;73(1):23–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. American Gastroenterological Association. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(1):209–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A. Development of a topographic analysis system for manometric studies in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48(4):395–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bredenoord AJ, Hebbard GS. Technical aspects of clinical high-resolution manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24 Suppl 1:5–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ, et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24 Suppl 1:57–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xiao Y, Read A, Nicodème F, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(10):e509–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Basseri B, Pimentel M, Shaye OA, Low K, Soffer EE, Conklin JL. Apple sauce improves detection of esophageal motor dysfunction during high-resolution manometry evaluation of dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(6):1723–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, Siersema PD, Smout AJ. Normal values for esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(9):762–e579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kahrilas PJ, Peters JH. Evaluation of the esophagogastric junction using high resolution manometry and esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:11–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin Z, Roman S, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Automated calculation of the distal contractile integral in esophageal pressure topography with a region-growing algorithm. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(1):e4–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin Z, Pandolfino JE, Xiao Y, Carlson D, Bidari K, Escobar G, et al. Localizing the contractile deceleration point (CDP) in patients with abnormal esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(10):972–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roman S, Pandolfino JE, Chen J, Boris L, Luger D, Kahrilas PJ. Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT). Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(1):37–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diamant NE. Physiology of esophageal motor function. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1989;18(2):179–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xiao Y, Kahrilas PJ, Kwasny MJ, Roman S, Lin Z, Nicodème F, et al. High-resolution manometry correlates of ineffective esophageal motility. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(11):1647–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Conklin JL. Evaluation of esophageal motor function with high-resolution manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19(3):281–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agrawal A, Tutuian R, Hila A, Freeman J, Castell DO. Identification of hiatal hernia by esophageal manometry: is it reliable? Dis Esophagus. 2005;18(5):316–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(5):1526–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saleh CM, Bredenoord AJ. Utilization of esophageal function testing for the diagnosis of the rumination syndrome and belching disorders. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24(4):633–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologySanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical SciencesLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations