Skip to main content

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to investigate the mechanical properties of a structural steel under quasi-static and dynamic loads. Specimens of as-received low-carbon mild steel are tested on universal testing machine to study their stress-strain behavior under quasi-static tension (0.001s−1) and compression (−0.001 s−1). Then, the specimens are tested under split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) and modified Hopkinson bar (MHB) to study their material properties under dynamic compressive (−550, −800s−1) and tensile (250, 500s−1) loading, respectively. The material parameters of the existing Johnson-Cook model are determined. Finally, the applicability of the existing Johnson-Cook material model to represent the mechanical behavior of mild steel in plastic zone is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Campbell JD, Duby J (1956) The yield behaviour of mild steel in dynamic compression. Proc R Soc Lond A 236(1204):24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell JD, Ferguson WG (1970) The temperature and strain-rate dependence of the shear strength of mild steel. Philos Mag 21(169):63–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen W, Song B (2011) Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar: design testing and applications. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Couque H, Walker JD (1994) On the use of the compression split Hopkinson pressure bar to high strain rate. J De Physique IV C8(4):23–28

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huh H, Lim JH, Park SH (2009) High speed tensile test of steel sheets for the stress-strain curve at the intermediate strain rate. Int J Automob Technol 10(2):195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klepaczko JR (1994) An experimental technique for shear testing at high and very high strain rates. The case of a mild steel. Int J Impact Eng 15:25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Langseth M, Lindholm US, Larsen PK, Lian B (1991) Strain-rate sensitivity of mild steel grade ST52-3 N. J Eng Mech 117(4):719–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee W-S, Liu C-Y (2005) Comparison of dynamic compressive flow behavior of mild and medium steels over wide temperature range. Metall Mater Trans 36A:3175–3186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsh KJ, Campbell JD (1963) The effect of strain rate on the post-yield flow of mild steel. J Mech Phys Solids 11:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pothnis JR, Perla Y, Arya H, Naik NK (2011) High strain rate tensile behavior of aluminum alloy 7075 T651 and IS 2062 mild steel. J Eng Mater Technol 133:021026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rusinek A, Zaera R, Klepaczko JR, Cheriguene R (2005) Analysis of inertia and scale effects on dynamic neck formation during tension of sheet steel. Acta Mater 53:5387–5400

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rusinek A, Zaera R, Klepaczko JR (2007) Constitutive relations in 3-D for a wide range of strain rates and temperatures – application to mild steels. Int J Solids Struct 44:5611–5634

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodríguez-Martínez JA, Rusinek A, Klepaczko JR (2009) Constitutive relation for steels approximating quasi-static and intermediate strain rates at large deformations. Mech Res Commun 36:419–427

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Santosham TV, Ramsey H (1969) The dynamic elastic behavior of mild steel, aluminum and copper as observed in wave propagation theory. Int J Mech Sci 11:751–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sasso M, Newaz G, Amodio D (2008) Material characterization at high strain rate by Hopkinson bar tests and finite element optimization. Mater Sci Eng A 487:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh NK, Cadoni E, Singha MK, Gupta NK (2011) Dynamic tensile behavior of multi phase high yield strength steel. Mater Des 32(10):5091–5098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh NK, Cadoni E, Singha MK, Gupta NK (2011) Quasi-static and dynamic tensile behavior of CP800 steel. Mech Adv Mater Struct. doi:10.1080/15376494.2012.699594

  18. Vedantam K, Bajaj D, Brar NS, Hill S (2005) Johnson-Cook strength models for mild and DP590 steels. Shock Compress Condens Matter CP845:775–778

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors thank D. Forni and M. Dotta of the DynaMat Laboratory, University of Applied Sciences of Southern Switzerland for the help in some experiments. The research was financially supported by the Indo-Swiss Joint Research Program sponsored by the “Department of Science and Technology” of India and “Swiss State Secretariat of Education and Research” of Switzerland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. K. Singha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Singh, N.K., Cadoni, E., Singha, M.K., Gupta, N.K. (2013). Mechanical Behavior of a Structural Steel at Different Rates of Loading. In: Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharya, G. (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering under Uncertainty: Safety Assessment and Management (ISEUSAM - 2012). Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0757-3_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0757-3_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, India

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-0756-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-0757-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics