Skip to main content

Two Perspectives on Intellectual Capital and Innovation in Teams: Collective Intelligence and Cognitive Diversity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Abstract

Teams are increasingly the locus of creativity and innovation in organizational settings, and understanding what affects their performance is critical to organizational performance. We draw on research from two different perspectives on intellectual capital to theorize about the enablers and disablers of innovation in teams. The first perspective draws on collective intelligence in human groups, and the second is related to team composition, specifically cognitive diversity. Borrowing from these two perspectives, we generate theory to integrate our understanding of how collective intelligence and cognitive diversity contribute toward (or detract from) the team’s potential to produce innovative solutions and products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal I, Woolley AW (2010) Do you see what i see? The effect of members’ cognitive styles on team processes and performance. Paper presented at the 70th meeting of the Academy of Management, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal I, Woolley AW, Chabris C, Malone T (2011) The relationship between collective intelligence, cognitive diversity and team learning. Paper presented at the 71st meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 10. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 123–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausburn LJ, Ausburn FB (1978) Cognitive styles: some information and implications for instructional design. Educ Commun Technol J 26:337–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin JR (1997) A cognitive framework for understanding demographic influences in groups. Int J Organ Anal 5(4):342–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovation in banking: does the composition of top team members make a difference? Strateg Manage J 10:107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering, a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettenhausen K, Murnighan JK (1985) The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Administrative Science Quartely 30(3):350–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettenhausen KL, Murnighan JK (1991) The development of an intragroup norm and the effects of interpersonal and structural challenges. Adm Sci Q 36(1):20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blajenkova O, Kozhevnikov M, Motes MA (2006) Object-spatial imagery: a new self-report imagery questionnaire. Appl Cognit Psychol 20:239–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Castellan NJ Jr (ed) Individual and group decision making: current issues. LEA, Hillsdale, pp 221–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr JL, Sin HP, Tesluk PE, Shavinina LV (2003) Knowledge management processes and work group innovation. Elsevier Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick CJ (1988) Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development. Acad Manage J 31:9–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick CJ, Hackman RJ (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 47:65–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison D, Price K, Bell M (1998) Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad Manage J 41:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsheger UR, Anderson N, Salgado JF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J Appl Psychol 94:1128–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter RM (1988) Three tiers for innovation research. Commun Res 15:509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Brooks-Shesler L, King EB, Zacaro S (2009) Thinking inside the box: how conformity promotes creativity and innovation. In: Mannix EA, Neale MA, Goncalo JA (eds) Research on managing groups and teams, vol 12. Emerald, Bingley, pp 229–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimoski R, Mohammed S (1994) Team mental model: construct or metaphor? J Manage 20:403–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozhevnikov M (2007) Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework. Psychol Bull 133:464–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn SM, Shephard J (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem Cognit 33:710–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Moreland RL (2004) Collaboration: the social context of theory development. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8:164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J Appl Psychol 85(2):273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (2005) Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons. J Organ Behav 26:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath JE, Rotchford NL (1983) Time and behavior in organizations. Res Organ Behav 5:57–101

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod PL, Lobel SA, Cox TH (1996) Ethnic diversity & creativity in small groups. Small Group Res 27:248–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick S (1984) The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promise in educational practice. Educ Psychol 19:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken F, Martins L (1996) Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad Manage Rev 21:402–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken FJ, Bartel CA, Kurtzberg TR (2003) Diversity and creativity in work groups: a dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. In: Paulus P, Nijstad B (eds) Group creativity: innovation through collaboration. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 32–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland RL, Levine JM, Wingert ML (1996) Creating the ideal group: composition effects at work. In: Davis J, Witte E (eds) Understanding group behavior, vol 2. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 11–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2006) How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of ideageneration in groups. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10:186–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad BA, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx HFM (2003) Production blocking and idea generation: does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? J Exp Soc Psychol 39:531–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA III, Williams KY, Barsade S (1998) Demography and group performance: does diversity help? In: Neale MA, Mannix EA, Gruenfeld D (eds) Research on managing groups and teams, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 183–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio A (1971) Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentsch J, Klimoski R (2001) Why do ‘great minds’ think alike? Antecedents of team member schema agreement. J Organ Behav 22(2):107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson A (1977) Verbalizer-visualizer: a cognitive style dimension. J Ment Imag 1:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel EF, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA (2009) What are we talking about, when we talk about creativity? Group creativity as a multifaceted, multistage phenomenon. In: Mannix EA, Neale MA, Goncalo JA (eds) Research on managing groups and teams, vol 12. Emerald, Bingley, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser G (1992) Information salience and discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: a “thought experiment”. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 52:156–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggar S (2002) Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model. Acad Manage J 45:315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MA (2000) Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. Adv Interdiscip Stud Work Teams 5:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • West MA (2002) Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: an integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Appl Psychol Int Rev 51:355–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Farr JL (1990) Innovation at work. In: West MA, Farr JL (eds) Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manage Rev 18:293–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330:686–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishani Aggarwal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aggarwal, I., Woolley, A. (2013). Two Perspectives on Intellectual Capital and Innovation in Teams: Collective Intelligence and Cognitive Diversity. In: Mukhopadhyay, C., et al. Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0746-7_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics