Skip to main content

Utilities’ Technology Management of Smart Grid Innovation and Implementation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 3099 Accesses

Abstract

Sustainability in society’s energy system, power producers and consumers need smart grid technology to balance the production and consumption of units. Smart grid constitutes a host of specifications, unproven products and concepts as well as a strong and dedicated innovation process for utility companies. Few proven concepts exist, and with its extent in time, smart grid represents an excellent case of technology management. The current study uses a series of loosely related technological studies of smart grid technologies in SME electricity companies to highlight and characterise critical issues. Major findings are that the companies have limited management of technology capabilities despite both strong push and pull, and the consequences of vaguely defined objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Banerjee A, Solomon BD (2003) Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability. Energy Policy 31:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson F, Ågerfalk PJ (2010) Information technology as a change actant in sustainability innovation. J Strateg Inf Syst 20(1):96–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhanhoo S (2010) China’s smart grid investments growing. New York Times, February 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Brem A, Voigt K-I (2009) Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management. Technovation 29:351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B et al (2002) Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. J Res Policy 31:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpio L, Margueron M (2009) Future strategies for distribution concessionaires in partially deregulated electric power sectors: Brazil. Electr J 22(7):70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole RE (2001) From continuous improvement to continuous innovation. Calif Manag Rev 40(5):8–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist C (2006) System of innovation – perspectives and challenge. In: Fagerberg J et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. University Press, Oxford, pp 182–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Energinet.dk (2010) Smart grid I Denmark (in Danish). Energinet.dk, Fredericia

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxon T, Pearson P (2008) Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: a sustainable innovation. J Clean Prod 16:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamser MS (1988) Power to the people – technology users and management of energy innovation. Energy Policy 16(1):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrity TF (2009) Innovation and trends for future electric power systems. In: Proceedings of the power systems conference 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman PS, Griffith TL (1991) A process approach to the implementation of new technology. J Eng Technol Manag 8:261–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen R et al (2000) Cooperative consumers in a deregulated electricity market. Energy Int J 25:857–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon R, Daim T, Raffo D (2010) Roadmapping the future of sustainable IT. In Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology (PICMET), 18–22 July, Phuket

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry C, Harborne P, Brown J (2010) So what do innovating companies really get from publicly funded demonstration projects and trials? Energy Policy 38:4507–4519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring H, Roy R (2007) Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect. Technovation 27:194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP (1983) Networks of power: electrification in western society, 1880–1930. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilic M (2010) Transforming SCADA into dynamic monitoring and decision systems: the missing link in smart grids. In: Power and Energy Society general meeting, 2010, IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamasb T, Pollit MG (2011) Electricity sector liberalisation and innovation: an analysis of the UK’s patenting activities. Res Policy 40:309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järventausta P, Repo S, Rautiainen A, Partanen J (2010) Smart grid power system control in distributed generation environment. Annu Rev Control 34:277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkin T, Webster J, MacShane L (2010) An agenda for ‘Green’ information technology and systems research. Inf Organ 1:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Joosting J-P (2010) Smart grid spending expected to top $45 billion by 2015. EE Times. July 8, 2010. Retrieved from http://eetimes.eu

  • JRC (2011) Smart grid projects in Europe: lessons learned and current developments. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy, Petten

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesling LL (2010) Promoting innovation. Institute of Economic Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch C et al (2008) Institutionalized technological foresight – methods, impact and role in policy making and business development. In: Proceedings of IAMOT, Dubai, UAE

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler E (2006) Technology intelligence identification of technological opportunities and threats by firms. Int J Technol Intell Plan 2(3):289–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looy Bv, Martens T, Debackere C (2005) Organizing for continuous innovation. Creativity Innov Manage 14(3):208–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luiten E, Lente H, Blok K (2006) Slow technologies and government intervention: energy efficiency in industrial process technologies. Technovation 26:1029–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson M, Martini A (2008) Dual organisational capabilities: from theory to practice – the next challenge for continuous innovation. Int J Technol Manage 42(1/2):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally RC et al (2009) Exploring new product portfolio management decisions: the role of managers dispositional traits. Ind Mark Manag 38(1):127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeus L, Saguan M (2011) Innovating grid regulation to regulate grid innovation: from the Orkney Isles to Kriegers Flak via Italy. Renew Energy 36:1761–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles RE, Miles G, Snow CC (2005) Collaborative entrepreneurship: a business model for continuous innovation. Organ Dyn 35(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirata M, Emtairah T (2004) Industrial symbiosis networks and the contribution to environmental innovation: Landskrona. J Clean Prod 13:993–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nill J, Kemp R (2009) Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: from niche to paradigm? Res Policy 38:668–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1996) A theory of organizational knowledge creation. IJTM Special Publ Unlearn Learn 11(7/8):833–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen OJ, Johnsen TA, Lewis P (2006) A mixed nordic experience: implementing competitive retail electricity markets for household. Electr J 19(9):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornetzeder M, Rohracher H (2006) User-led innovations and participation processes: lessons from sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy 34(2):138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrick I, Echols AE (2004) Technology roadmapping in review: a tool for making sustainable new product. Technol Forecast Social Change 71:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2004) Technology roadmapping—a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technol Forecast Social Change 71:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regeringen (2011) Energistrategi 2050. The Danish Government, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling MA (2008) Strategic management of technological innovation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz S, Tambo T (2011) Organisational innovation systems for a greener industry. In: Proceedings of the 20th IAMOT, Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Ruud A (2003) On the path to sustainability: integrating social dimensions into the research and practice. Bus Strateg Environ 12:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shum KL, Watanabe C (2009) An innovation management approach for renewable energy deployment—the case of solar photovoltaic. Energy Policy 37:3535–3544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sisley E (2007) Enterprise architecture for the smart grid: a status update. Carnegie-Mellon. Online at http://www.sei.cmu.edu

  • Snow CC, Fjeldstad ØD, Lettl C, Miles RE (2010) Organizing continuous product development and commercialization. J Prod Innov Manage 28:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Switzer S, Trout JP (2007) The “optimal” structure of the deregulated electric utility industry. Electr J 20(6):8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambo T (2011) Smart grid innovation management for SME Electricity Companies. In: Proceedings of the CINET 2011, Aarhus, September 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K (2008) Managing innovation – integrating technological, market and organizational change. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoutsos T, Stamboulis Y (2005) The sustainable diffusion of renewable energy technologies as an example of an innovation-focused policy. Technovation 25:753–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanston J (2003) Better forecasts, better plans, better results. Res Technol Manage 46(1):47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergragt PJ, Brown HS (2007) Sustainable mobility: from technological innovation to societal learning. J Clean Prod 15:1104–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissner M (2011) The smart grid – a saucerful of secrets? Utilities Policy 19:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torben Tambo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tambo, T. (2013). Utilities’ Technology Management of Smart Grid Innovation and Implementation. In: Mukhopadhyay, C., et al. Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0746-7_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics