Abstract

The observation of peak flows into river or stream system is not straight forward but complex function of hydrology and geology of the region. There are well established statistical approach to predict the flood events with their magnitude and frequency. Development of models based on temporal observations may improve understanding the underlying hydrological processes in such complex phenomena. Present work utilized temporal patterns extracted from temporal observations of annual peak series using wavelet theory. These patterns are then utilized by an artificial neural network (ANN). The wavelet-ANN conjunction model is then able to predict the flood event comparable to statistical approach. The application of the proposed methodology is illustrated with real data. The limited performance evaluation of the methodology show potential application of the developed methodology.

Keywords

Wavelet analysis ANN Wavelet-ANN Time series modeling Flood event prediction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., Mays, L.W.: Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Subramanya, K.: Engineering Hydrology. Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Private Limited, New Delhi (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garg, S.K.: Irrigation Engineering and Hydraulic Structures. Khanna Publishers, Delhi (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salas, J.D.: The McGraw Hill Handbook of Hydrology. In: Maidment, D. (ed.) Analysis and Modeling of Hydrologic Time series, ch.19 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salas, J.D., Delleur, J.W., Yevjevich, V., Lane, W.L.: Applied modeling of hydrologic time series, 484 p. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado (1980); 2nd Printing 1985, 3rd Printing 1988Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thirumalaiah, K., Deo, M.C.: Real-time flood forecasting using neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 13, 101–111 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corani, G., Guariso, G.: Coupling fuzzy modeling and neural networks for river flood prediction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews 35(3), 382–390 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, Q., Chen, J., Becker, S.: Flood/drought change of last millennium in the Yangtze Delta and its possible connections with Tibetan climatic changes. Global and Planetary Change 57, 213–221 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J.: Learning internal representation by error propagation. In: Parallel Distributed Processing, vol. 1, pp. 318–362. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bishop, C.M.: Neural Networks For Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, India (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh, R.M., Datta, B., Jain, A.: Identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources using artificial neural networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE 130(6), 506–514 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagan, M.T., Menhaj, M.B.: Training feed forward networks with the Marquaradt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 6, 861–867 (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kisi, O.: Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms. J. Hydrol. Eng. 12(5), 532–539 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haykin, S.: Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, 696 p. Mac- Millan, New York (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daubechies, I.: Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets, commun. Pure and Appllied Mathmatics XLI, 901–996 (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kang, S., Lin, H.: Wavelet analysis of hydrological and water quality signals in an agricultural watershed. Journal of Hydrology 338, 1–14 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MATLAB, The Language of Technical Computing. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Mass., USA (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mallat, S.G.: A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic, San Diego (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1-A: Discussion principles. Journal of Hydrology 10, 282–290 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models, Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE 119(3), 429–442 (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India Pvt. Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringMNNITAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations