Skip to main content

The Brief Fatigue Syndrome Scale: Validation and Utilization in Fatigue Recovery Studies

  • Chapter
Book cover Fatigue Science for Human Health

Abstract

Medically, nonexplained fatigue is a significant clinical and public health concern. However, the construct fatigue is not easily defined, and this is reflected in the large number of different scales used to measure fatigue. In this chapter, we define fatigue using the sustained stress activation theory. It is proposed that sustained stress, with a lack of sufficient recovery periods, is characterized by a decline in the ability to concentrate, be energetic, and sleep. Based on this definition, the brief fatigue syndrome scale (BFSS) was created using visual analogue scales (VAS) to rate self-assessed energy, ability to concentrate, and quality of sleep. The BFSS consisted of one factor, with a Cronbach’s α of >0.70. The validity and sensitivity of the scale was assessed by following a group of fatigued patients undergoing a 1-year lifestyle recovery program. In addition, a reference group of healthy controls was followed over the same period. Both groups responded regularly to a survey containing the BFSS. Blood samples were also collected during the first 6 months. The BFSS scores decreased significantly as the clinical conditions of the fatigued participants improved. Furthermore, self-rated mental energy, assessed by a separate and validated five-item Likert-type scale, improved with decreasing fatigue. Participants scoring above the proposed cut-off point of 8 for depression on the hospital depression and anxiety scale had significantly higher BFSS scores. BFSS scores were also higher among subjects scoring in the burn-out range on the Shirom-Melamed scale. Decreased fatigue over time was related to improved/ increased serum levels of testosterone. It is suggested that the cut-off point for fatigue vs. nonfatigue should be set at 40%. The BFSS is suggested as a valid and quick instrument to assess fatigue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fehnel SE, Bann CM, Hogue SL, Kwong WJ, Mahajan SS (2004) The development and psychometric evaluation of the motivation and energy inventory (MEI). Qual Life Res 13:1321–1336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Masand PS, Gupta S (1999) Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: an update. Harvard Rev Psychiatr 7:69–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein KD, Martin SC, Hann DM, Jacobsen PB (1998) A multi-dimensional measure of fatigue for use with cancer patients. Cancer Pract 6:143–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kent-Braun JA, Sharma KR, Weiner MW, Massie B, Miller RG (1993) Central basis of muscle fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome. Neurology 43:125–131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kroenke K, Wood DR, Mangelsdorff DA, Meirer NJ, Powell JB (1988) Chronic fatigue in primary care: prevalence, patient characteristics, and outcome. J Am Med Assoc 260:929–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Melillo N, Corrado A, Quarta L, D’Onofrio F, Trotta A, Cantatore FP (2005) Fibromialgic syndrome: new perspectives in rehabilitation and management. A review. Minerva Med 96:417–423

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Appels A, de Vos Y, van Diest R, Höppner P, Mulder P, de Groen J (1987) Are sleep complaints predictive of future myocardial infarction? Activitas Nervosa Superior 29:147–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Melamed S, Ugarten U, Shirom A, Kahana L, Lerman Y, Froom P (1999) Chronic burnout, somatic arousal and elevated salivary cortisol levels. J Psychosom Res 46:591–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalia M (2002) Assessing the economic impact of stress. The modern-day hidden epidemic. Metabolism 51 Suppl 1:49–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Uehata T (1991) Karoshi due to occupational stress-related cardiovascular injuries among middle-aged workers in Japan. J Sci Labour 67:20–28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Winwood PC, Winefield AH, Dawson D, Lushington K (2005) Development and validation of a scale to measure work-related fatigue and recovery: the occupational fatigue/recovery scale (OFER). J Occup Environ Med 47:594–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderzén I, Arnetz BB (2005) The impact of a prospective survey-based workplace intervention program on employee health, biological stress markers, and organizational productivity. J Occup Environ Med 47:671–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heim C, Bierl C, Nisenbaum R, Waginer D, Reeves WC (2004) Regional prevalence of fatiguing illnesses in the United States before and after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Psychosom Med 66:672–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis G, Wessely S (1992) The epidemiology of fatigue: more questions than answers. J Epid Com Health 46:92–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dittner AJ, Wessely SC, Brown RG (2004) The assessment of fatigue. A practical guide for clinicians and researchers. J Psychosom Res 56:157–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Arnetz BB, Ekman R (2006) Fatigue and recovery. In: Arnetz B, Ekman R (eds) Wiley-VCH, New York, pp 298–309

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shapiro CM (2004) Chronic fatigue: chronically confusing but growing information. Editorial. J Psychosom Res 56:153–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Felton JS (1998) Burnout as a clinical entity: its importance in health care workers. Occup Med 48:237–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Krupp LB, Alvarez LA, LaRocca NG, Scheinberg LC (1988) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 45:435–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pearson PG, Byars GE (1956) The development and validation of a checklist measuring subjective fatigue. Report no. 56–115, School of Aviation, USAF, Randolf AFB, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brook RH, Ware JE, Davies-Avery A, Stewart AL, Donald CA, Rogers WH, Williams KN, Johnston SA (1979) Overview of adult health status measures fielded in Rand’s health insurance study. Med Care 17(Suppl):1–55

    Google Scholar 

  22. Montgomery GK (1983) Uncommon tiredness among college undergraduates. J Con Clin Psychol 51:517–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Krupp B, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD (1989) The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systematic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 46:1121–1123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wessely S, Powell R (1989) Fatigue syndromes: a comparison of chronic postviral fatigue with neuromuscular and affective disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychol 52:940–948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Haylock PJ, Kart LK (1979) Fatigue in patients receiving localized radiation. Cancer Nursing 2:461–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Piper BF, Lindsey AM, Dodd MJ, Ferketich S, Paul SM, Weller S (1989) The development of an instrument to measure the subjective dimension of fatigue. In: Funk SG, Tornquist EM, Campagene MT, Archer Gropp LM, Wiese RA (eds) Key aspects of comfort: management of pain, fatigue and nausea. Springer, New York, pp 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stein KD, Martin Sc, Hann DM, Jacobsen PA (1998) A multidimensional measure of fatigue for use with cancer patients. Cancer Pract 6:143–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fawzy FI, Cousin N, Fawzy NW, Kemeny ME, Elashoff R, Morton D (1990) a structured psychiatric intervention for cancer patients. Arch Gen Psychiatr 18:35–59

    Google Scholar 

  29. Salinsky MC, Storzbach D, Dodrill CB, Binder LM (2001) Test-retest bias, reliability, and regression equations for neuropsychological measures repeated over a 12–16-week period. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 7:597–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vercoulen JHMM, Swanink CMA, Fennis JFM, Galama JMD, van der Meer JWM, Bleijenberg G (1994) Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res 38:383–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A (1994) The chronic fatigue syndrome. A comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med 121:953–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Raison CL, Miller AH (2003) When not enough is too much: the role of insufficient glucocorticoid signaling in the pathophysiology of stress-related disorders. Am J Psychiatr 160:1554–1565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Svenningsson P, Chergui K, Rachleff I, Flajolet M, Zhang X, El Yacoubi M, Vaugeois J-M, Nomikos GG, Greengard P (2006) Alterations in 5-HT1b receptor function by p11 depressionlike states. Science 311:77–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hasson D, Anderberg UM, Theorell T, Arnetz BB (2005) Psychophysiological effects of a web-based stress management system. A prospective, randomized controlled intervention study of IT and media workers. BMC Public Health 5:78 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/78)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hasson D, Arnetz BB (2005) Validation and findings comparing VAS vs. Likert scales for psychosocial measurements. Int Electron J Health Educ 8:178–192

    Google Scholar 

  36. Arnetz BB (1996) Techno-stress. A prospective psychophysiological study of the impact of a controlled stress-reduction program in advanced telecommunication systems design work. JOEM 38:53–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lisspers J, Sundin Ö, Öhman A, Hofman-Bang C, Rydén L, Nygren Å (2005) Long-term effects of lifestyle behavior change in coronary artery disease: effects on recurrent coronary events after percutaneous coronary intervention. Health Psychol 24:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lisspers J, Hofman-Bang C, Nordlander R, Rydén L, Sundin Ö, Öhman A, Nygren Å (1999) Multifactorial evaluation of a program for lifestyle behavior change in rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. Scand Cardiovasc J 33:9–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arnetz, B.B., Frenzel, L., Åkerstedt, T., Lisspers, J. (2008). The Brief Fatigue Syndrome Scale: Validation and Utilization in Fatigue Recovery Studies. In: Watanabe, Y., Evengård, B., Natelson, B.H., Jason, L.A., Kuratsune, H. (eds) Fatigue Science for Human Health. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73464-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73464-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-73463-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-73464-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics